EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

ecoWise Holdings vs Waste Management: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how ecoWise Holdings (5CT) and Waste Management (WM) compare, as of Oct 3, 2026.

As of Oct 3, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ecoWise Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: ecoWise Holdings trades at S$0.02 versus a fair value of S$0.02 (+18.1%), while Waste Management trades at $204 versus $224 (+9.7%).
ecoWise Holdings
5CT.SG · SGD · Industrials
+18.1%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceS$0.02
Fair ValueS$0.02
Quality51/100
Waste Management
WM · USD · Industrials
+9.7%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price$204
Fair Value$224
Quality56/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

ecoWise HoldingsWaste Management
Valuation
0.4×P/E (TTM)28.6×
n/aP/E ex one-offs (FY2025)28.8×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)22.4×
n/aMedian P/E at FY-end (10 FY, ex one-offs where documented)28.8×
0.60×P/S (TTM)3.17×
0.91×P/B8.15× · book value is mostly goodwill
n/aEV/EBITDA13.3×
n/aPEG1.90×
+18.1%Fair value upside+9.7%
n/aDividend yield1.8%
n/aDividend per share$3.54
Profitability
-15.9%Operating margin19.0%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.12×
-9.6%Return on equity29.8%
-2.8%Return on assets6.6%
Growth
-33.4%Revenue growth (YoY)4.0%
n/aAvg. growth/yr (3Y)8.6%
-9.3%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.6%
n/aValue creation/yr+14.0%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)5.1×
0.20×Debt / equity2.22×
$19MMarket cap$81B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
The P/E excluding one-off items is only shown where the special items are documented in the accounts (our own raw data or SEC filings). If one side lacks it, the reported P/E stays scored.
Waste Management, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 10 fiscal years (2016 to 2025), reported earnings, 7 of the years ex one-offs: 28.8.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.

Even match: 4 to 4 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

ecoWise Holdingsof which business quality 55 · market factors 48 Waste Managementof which business quality 53 · market factors 48
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
21
50
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
16
56
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
76
64
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
76
33
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
35
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
94
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
46
31
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
50
25
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
47
84

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyecoWise HoldingsPrice S$0.02Waste ManagementPrice $204
DCF Models+185.7%above the priceS$0.06−35.8%below the price$131
Earnings-Basedn/a−60.5%below the price$80.76
Multiples+66.7%above the priceS$0.04−37.4%below the price$128
Asset-Based−52.4%below the priceS$0.01−91.8%below the price$16.75
Growth DCF+209.5%above the priceS$0.07−40.3%below the price$122
Economic Profitn/a−66.3%below the price$68.90
Growth Earningsn/a−37.1%below the price$129
Minimum−52.4%below the priceS$0.01−91.8%below the price$16.75
Maximum+209.5%above the priceS$0.07−35.8%below the price$131
Median+126.2%above the priceS$0.05−40.3%below the price$122
Geometric mean+62.8%above the priceS$0.03−60.0%below the price$81.85

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

ecoWise Holdings: 2 of 10 models see the stock below the current price.

Waste Management: 22 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

ecoWise Holdings
Price S$0.02
Fair Value S$0.02
Bear S$0.02Bull S$0.03
Waste Management
Price $204
Fair Value $224
Bear $120Bull $292

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

ecoWise Holdings · Industrials

Quality score51 · below median
Fair value upside+18.1% · above median

Waste Management · Industrials

Quality score56 · above median
Fair value upside+9.7% · above median

Bottom line

As of Oct 3, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ecoWise Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: ecoWise Holdings trades at S$0.02 versus a fair value of S$0.02 (+18.1%), while Waste Management trades at $204 versus $224 (+9.7%).

Waste Management has the higher quality score (56/100).

Open ecoWise Holdings live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.