EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Nanjing Central Emporium Group Stocks Co vs Falabella S.A: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Nanjing Central Emporium Group Stocks Co (600280) and Falabella S.A (FALABELLA) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Falabella S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: Nanjing Central Emporium Group Stocks Co trades at ¥2.88 versus a fair value of ¥1.19 (-59%), while Falabella S.A trades at CLP 6,470 versus CLP 8,880 (+37%).
Nanjing Central Emporium Group Stocks Co
600280.SHG · CNY · Consumer Discretionary
-59%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥2.88
Fair Value¥1.19
Quality49/100
Falabella S.A
FALABELLA.SN · CLP · Consumer Discretionary
+37%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceCLP 6,470
Fair ValueCLP 8,880
Quality57/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Nanjing Central Emporium Group Stocks CoFalabella S.A
Valuation
P/E (TTM)10.7×
0.24×P/S (TTM)1.11×
1.78×P/B1.88×
3.5×EV/EBITDA7.4×
PEG1.03×
Profitability
-20%Net margin10%
16%Operating margin13%
-85%Return on equity22%
0%Return on assets4%
Growth
-20%Revenue growth (YoY)7%
-5.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.7%
-7.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)7.0%
Balance & size
1.52×Debt / equity0.06×
$486MMarket cap$16B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Falabella S.A leads: 4 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Nanjing Central Emporium Group Stocks Coof which business quality 46 · market factors 25 Falabella S.Aof which business quality 54 · market factors 69
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
6
44
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
45
51
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
71
48
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
2
46
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
68
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
48
79
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
16
57
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
14
80
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
94
81

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Nanjing Central Emporium Group Stocks Co

DCF Models¥3.25
Earnings-Based¥0.96
Dividend Discount¥1.61
Multiples¥2.45
Asset-Based¥0.16
Growth DCF¥2.77
Economic Profit¥1.00

10 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Falabella S.A

DCF ModelsCLP 8,510
Earnings-BasedCLP 5,125
MultiplesCLP 8,613
Asset-BasedCLP 2,129
Growth DCFCLP 8,036
Economic ProfitCLP 6,423
Growth EarningsCLP 10,208

5 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Nanjing Central Emporium Group Stocks Co
Bear ¥1.19Fair Value ¥1.19Bull ¥2.41
¥2.88 = current price (white tick)
Falabella S.A
Bear CLP 5,892Fair Value CLP 8,880Bull CLP 12,406
CLP 6,470 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Nanjing Central Emporium Group Stocks Co · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score49 · below median
Fair value upside-59% · bottom 25%

Falabella S.A · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score57 · above median
Fair value upside+37% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Falabella S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: Nanjing Central Emporium Group Stocks Co trades at ¥2.88 versus a fair value of ¥1.19 (-59%), while Falabella S.A trades at CLP 6,470 versus CLP 8,880 (+37%).

Falabella S.A has the higher quality score (57/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.