EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Guizhou Redstar Developing Co vs Saudi Basic Industries: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Guizhou Redstar Developing Co (600367) and Saudi Basic Industries (2010) compare, as of Aug 27, 2026.

As of Aug 27, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Saudi Basic Industries as the less overvalued of the two: Guizhou Redstar Developing Co trades at ¥40.50 versus a fair value of ¥4.63 (-89%), while Saudi Basic Industries trades at SAR 50.35 versus SAR 36.26 (-28%).
Guizhou Redstar Developing Co
600367.SHG · CNY · Materials
-89%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥40.50
Fair Value¥4.63
Quality52/100
Saudi Basic Industries
2010.SR · SAR · Materials
-28%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceSAR 50.35
Fair ValueSAR 36.26
Quality47/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Guizhou Redstar Developing CoSaudi Basic Industries
Valuation
125.8×P/E (TTM)—
5.38×P/S (TTM)0.35×
4.54×P/B0.31×
33.0×EV/EBITDA2.1×
0.1%Dividend yield6.0%
¥0.04Dividend per shareSAR 3.00
Profitability
4%Net margin-22%
8%Operating margin5%
4%Return on equity1%
3%Return on assets2%
Growth
-11%Revenue growth (YoY)-11%
-9.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-14.0%
9.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-0.1%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.17×
$2BMarket cap$40B
expensiveGrowth qualityweak

Guizhou Redstar Developing Co leads: 6 to 4 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Guizhou Redstar Developing Coof which business quality 55 · market factors 73 Saudi Basic Industriesof which business quality 47 · market factors 47
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
31
9
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
51
29
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
38
40
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
97
56
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
56
90
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
40
88
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
94
32
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
75
26
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
55
81

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Guizhou Redstar Developing Co

DCF Models¥3.78
Earnings-Based¥3.50
Multiples¥7.18
Asset-Based¥4.83
Economic Profit¥6.87
Growth Earnings¥4.10

15 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Saudi Basic Industries

DCF ModelsSAR 40.13
Earnings-BasedSAR 13.05
Dividend DiscountSAR 34.61
MultiplesSAR 23.38
Asset-BasedSAR 28.75
Growth DCFSAR 34.28
Economic ProfitSAR 13.05

14 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Guizhou Redstar Developing Co
Bear ¥3.47Fair Value ¥4.63Bull ¥5.78
¥40.50 = current price (white tick)
Saudi Basic Industries
Bear SAR 25.64Fair Value SAR 36.26Bull SAR 46.88
SAR 50.35 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Guizhou Redstar Developing Co · Materials

Quality score52 · above median
Fair value upside-89% · bottom 25%

Saudi Basic Industries · Materials

Quality score47 · below median
Fair value upside-28% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 27, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Saudi Basic Industries as the less overvalued of the two: Guizhou Redstar Developing Co trades at ¥40.50 versus a fair value of ¥4.63 (-89%), while Saudi Basic Industries trades at SAR 50.35 versus SAR 36.26 (-28%).

Guizhou Redstar Developing Co has the higher quality score (52/100).

See the full analysis →
Guizhou Redstar Developing Co · Saudi Basic Industries

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Guizhou Redstar Developing Co

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs PDD Holdings

Related to Saudi Basic Industries

Amazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&tMeta Platforms vs NetEase
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.