EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

China Security & Fire Co Ltd Class A vs ASSA ABLOY AB (publ): Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how China Security & Fire Co Ltd Class A (600654) and ASSA ABLOY AB (publ) (ASSA-B) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ASSA ABLOY AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: China Security & Fire Co Ltd Class A trades at ¥2.99 versus a fair value of ¥0.32 (-89%), while ASSA ABLOY AB (publ) trades at SEK 367 versus SEK 270 (-26%).
China Security & Fire Co Ltd Class A
600654.SHG · CNY · Information Technology
-89%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥2.99
Fair Value¥0.32
Quality54/100
ASSA ABLOY AB (publ)
ASSA-B.ST · SEK · Consumer Discretionary
-26%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceSEK 367
Fair ValueSEK 270
Quality64/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

China Security & Fire Co Ltd Class AASSA ABLOY AB (publ)
Valuation
99.7×P/E (TTM)24.5×
2.86×P/S (TTM)2.56×
5.46×P/B3.81×
EV/EBITDA14.9×
PEG1.57×
Dividend yield1.9%
Dividend per shareSEK 6.40
Profitability
2%Net margin11%
5%Operating margin17%
4%Return on equity16%
-0%Return on assets7%
Growth
-13%Revenue growth (YoY)3%
6.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.1%
0.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)11.7%
Balance & size
0.11×Debt / equity0.46×
$1BMarket cap$41B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

ASSA ABLOY AB (publ) leads: 1 to 10 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

China Security & Fire Co Ltd Class Aof which business quality 53 · market factors 30 ASSA ABLOY AB (publ)of which business quality 62 · market factors 59
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
31
52
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
40
51
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
36
66
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
66
58
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
95
73
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
61
79
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
12
46
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
26
59
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
73
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

China Security & Fire Co Ltd Class A

DCF Models¥0.42
Earnings-Based¥0.15
Dividend Discount¥0.09
Multiples¥0.32
Asset-Based¥0.37
Growth DCF¥0.33
Economic Profit¥0.38
Growth Earnings¥0.35

22 of 22 models see the stock below the current price.

ASSA ABLOY AB (publ)

DCF ModelsSEK 327
Earnings-BasedSEK 146
MultiplesSEK 265
Asset-BasedSEK 64.63
Growth DCFSEK 276
Economic ProfitSEK 169
Growth EarningsSEK 240

23 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

China Security & Fire Co Ltd Class A
Bear ¥0.26Fair Value ¥0.32Bull ¥0.40
¥2.99 = current price (white tick)
ASSA ABLOY AB (publ)
Bear SEK 180Fair Value SEK 270Bull SEK 354
SEK 367 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

China Security & Fire Co Ltd Class A · Information Technology

Quality score54 · below median
Fair value upside-89% · bottom 25%

ASSA ABLOY AB (publ) · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score64 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-26% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ASSA ABLOY AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: China Security & Fire Co Ltd Class A trades at ¥2.99 versus a fair value of ¥0.32 (-89%), while ASSA ABLOY AB (publ) trades at SEK 367 versus SEK 270 (-26%).

ASSA ABLOY AB (publ) has the higher quality score (64/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.