EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Ningbo Fuda Co vs CBRE Group Inc Class A: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Ningbo Fuda Co (600724) and CBRE Group Inc Class A (CBRE) compare, as of Sep 24, 2026.

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees CBRE Group Inc Class A as the less overvalued of the two: Ningbo Fuda Co trades at ¥5.05 versus a fair value of ¥2.49 (-51%), while CBRE Group Inc Class A trades at $136 versus $89.43 (-34%).
Ningbo Fuda Co
600724.SHG · CNY · Real Estate
-51%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥5.05
Fair Value¥2.49
Quality71/100
CBRE Group Inc Class A
CBRE · USD · Real Estate
-34%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$136
Fair Value$89.43
Quality53/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Ningbo Fuda CoCBRE Group Inc Class A
Valuation
38.8×P/E (TTM)31.1×
5.08×P/S (TTM)0.97×
2.55×P/B4.62× · book value is mostly goodwill
19.1×EV/EBITDA20.1×
n/aPEG0.74×
−50.7%Fair value upside−34.4%
2.4%Dividend yieldn/a
¥0.12Dividend per sharen/a
Profitability
23%Operating margin3%
0.56×EBIT margin trend (5Y)0.78×
4%Return on equity16%
4%Return on assets3%
Growth
-12%Revenue growth (YoY)19%
n/aAvg. growth/yr (3Y)9.6%
n/aAvg. growth/yr (5Y)11.2%
−12.9%Value creation/yr+3.0%
Balance & size
16.6×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)5.8×
0.06×Debt / equity0.57×
$1BMarket cap$41B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

CBRE Group Inc Class A leads: 5 to 6 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Ningbo Fuda Coof which business quality 69 · market factors 38 CBRE Group Inc Class Aof which business quality 53 · market factors 39
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
33
49
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
50
33
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
87
44
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
77
38
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
95
69
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
62
53
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
31
40
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
21
20
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
82
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyNingbo Fuda CoPrice ¥5.05CBRE Group Inc Class APrice $136
DCF Models-50%below the price¥2.54-20%below the price$109
Dividend Discount-69%below the price¥1.56n/a
Multiples-54%below the price¥2.30-51%below the price$67.17
Asset-Based-74%below the price¥1.33-85%below the price$20.31
Growth DCF-51%below the price¥2.48-37%below the price$86.47
Economic Profit-69%below the price¥1.55-74%below the price$35.50
Minimum-74%below the price¥1.33-85%below the price$20.31
Maximum-50%below the price¥2.54-20%below the price$109
Median-62%below the price¥1.93-51%below the price$67.17
Geometric mean-62%below the price¥1.90-60%below the price$53.95

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Ningbo Fuda Co: 16 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

CBRE Group Inc Class A: 13 of 14 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Ningbo Fuda Co
Price ¥5.05
Fair Value ¥2.49
Bear ¥1.83Bull ¥3.14
CBRE Group Inc Class A
Price $136
Fair Value $89.43
Bear $47.40Bull $160

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Ningbo Fuda Co · Real Estate

Quality score71 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-51% · bottom 25%

CBRE Group Inc Class A · Real Estate

Quality score53 · above median
Fair value upside-34% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees CBRE Group Inc Class A as the less overvalued of the two: Ningbo Fuda Co trades at ¥5.05 versus a fair value of ¥2.49 (-51%), while CBRE Group Inc Class A trades at $136 versus $89.43 (-34%).

Ningbo Fuda Co has the higher quality score (71/100).

Open CBRE Group Inc Class A live analysis →
Ningbo Fuda Co · CBRE Group Inc Class A

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Ningbo Fuda Co

Microsoft vs NvidiaApple vs MicrosoftNvidia vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing

Related to CBRE Group Inc Class A

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Meta PlatformsCisco Systems vs NvidiaMicrosoft vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Cisco Systems
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.