Xiamen ITG Group Corp vs Citic Pacific: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Xiamen ITG Group Corp (600755) and Citic Pacific (0267) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Citic Pacific leads: 3 to 7 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Xiamen ITG Group Corp
3 of 9 models see the stock below the current price.
Citic Pacific
1 of 11 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Xiamen ITG Group Corp · Industrials
Citic Pacific · Industrials
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Citic Pacific as the more attractively valued of the two: Xiamen ITG Group Corp trades at ¥5.73 versus a fair value of ¥5.00 (-13%), while Citic Pacific trades at HK$11.89 versus HK$22.56 (+90%).
Xiamen ITG Group Corp has the higher quality score (49/100).
See the full analysis →More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.