EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

China Building Material vs Verisk Analytics: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how China Building Material (603060) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK) compare, as of Sep 24, 2026.

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Verisk Analytics as the less overvalued of the two: China Building Material trades at ¥5.46 versus a fair value of ¥2.89 (-47%), while Verisk Analytics trades at $172 versus $146 (-15%).
China Building Material
603060.SHG · CNY · Industrials
-47%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥5.46
Fair Value¥2.89
Quality51/100
Verisk Analytics
VRSK · USD · Industrials
-15%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$172
Fair Value$146
Quality76/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

China Building MaterialVerisk Analytics
Valuation
36.4×P/E (TTM)24.9×
1.67×P/S (TTM)8.51×
2.07×P/BNegative equity
14.0×EV/EBITDA18.2×
n/aPEG1.86×
−47.1%Fair value upside−15.3%
1.2%Dividend yield1.1%
¥0.07Dividend per share$1.85
Profitability
-5%Operating margin45%
0.30×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.06×
6%Return on equityNegative equity
2%Return on assets18%
Growth
5%Revenue growth (YoY)4%
2.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)7.2%
12.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)6.2%
−11.7%Value creation/yr+10.0%
Balance & size
3.1×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)8.0×
0.46×Debt / equityNegative equity
$655MMarket cap$26B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

Verisk Analytics leads: 4 to 9 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

China Building Materialof which business quality 51 · market factors 37 Verisk Analyticsof which business quality 71 · market factors 34
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
40
75
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
40
20
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
53
88
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
41
55
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
65
89
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
78
69
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
24
26
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
13
9
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
81
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyChina Building MaterialPrice ¥5.46Verisk AnalyticsPrice $172
DCF Models-38%below the price¥3.38-10%close to the price$155
Earnings-Based-66%below the price¥1.88-61%below the price$66.66
Dividend Discount-64%below the price¥1.99n/a
Multiples-51%below the price¥2.68-44%below the price$96.24
Asset-Based-68%below the price¥1.76-99%below the price$1.58
Growth DCF-38%below the price¥3.37-30%below the price$121
Economic Profit-77%below the price¥1.26-66%below the price$57.96
Growth Earnings-47%below the price¥2.89-24%below the price$130
Minimum-77%below the price¥1.26-99%below the price$1.58
Maximum-38%below the price¥3.38-10%close to the price$155
Median-57%below the price¥2.33-44%below the price$96.24
Geometric mean-58%below the price¥2.28-68%below the price$54.50

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

China Building Material: 24 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Verisk Analytics: 22 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

China Building Material
Price ¥5.46
Fair Value ¥2.89
Bear ¥1.92Bull ¥3.76
Verisk Analytics
Price $172
Fair Value $146
Bear $102Bull $227

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

China Building Material · Industrials

Quality score51 · below median
Fair value upside-47% · below median

Verisk Analytics · Industrials

Quality score76 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-15% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Verisk Analytics as the less overvalued of the two: China Building Material trades at ¥5.46 versus a fair value of ¥2.89 (-47%), while Verisk Analytics trades at $172 versus $146 (-15%).

Verisk Analytics has the higher quality score (76/100).

Open Verisk Analytics live analysis →
China Building Material · Verisk Analytics

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to China Building Material

Microsoft vs NvidiaApple vs MicrosoftNvidia vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing

Related to Verisk Analytics

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Meta PlatformsCisco Systems vs NvidiaMicrosoft vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Cisco Systems
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.