EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Ningbo Shenglong Automotive Powertrain System Co vs Toyota Motor: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Ningbo Shenglong Automotive Powertrain System Co (603178) and Toyota Motor (TM) compare, as of Aug 28, 2026.

As of Aug 28, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Toyota Motor as the more attractively valued of the two: Ningbo Shenglong Automotive Powertrain System Co trades at ¥16.48 versus a fair value of ¥8.47 (-49%), while Toyota Motor trades at $189 versus $228 (+21%).
Ningbo Shenglong Automotive Powertrain System Co
603178.SHG · CNY · Consumer Discretionary
-49%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥16.48
Fair Value¥8.47
Quality44/100
Toyota Motor
TM.NYSE · USD · Consumer Discretionary
+21%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$189
Fair Value$228
Quality46/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Ningbo Shenglong Automotive Powertrain System CoToyota Motor
Valuation
P/E (TTM)9.8×
0.37×P/S (TTM)0.67×
0.53×P/B0.84×
EV/EBITDA8.3×
PEG1.54×
0.4%Dividend yield3.5%
Dividend per share$95.00
Profitability
-10%Net margin8%
5%Operating margin5%
-13%Return on equity10%
-3%Return on assets2%
Growth
-8%Revenue growth (YoY)2%
4.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.9%
6.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)13.2%
Balance & size
0.04×Debt / equity0.64×
$601MMarket cap$213B
mixedGrowth qualityexpensive

Toyota Motor leads: 3 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Ningbo Shenglong Automotive Powertrain System Coof which business quality 44 · market factors 36 Toyota Motorof which business quality 45 · market factors 68
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
12
33
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
30
29
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
21
33
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
73
49
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
88
43
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
56
100
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
31
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
23
31
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
64
92

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Ningbo Shenglong Automotive Powertrain System Co

DCF Models¥2.27
Dividend Discount¥1.01
Multiples¥2.16
Asset-Based¥3.23
Growth DCF¥2.33

9 of 9 models see the stock below the current price.

Toyota Motor

DCF Models$228
Earnings-Based$155
Multiples$400
Asset-Based$174
Growth DCF$189
Economic Profit$184
Growth Earnings$491

7 of 22 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Ningbo Shenglong Automotive Powertrain System Co
Bear ¥5.38Fair Value ¥8.47Bull ¥11.56
¥16.48 = current price (white tick)
Toyota Motor
Bear $197Fair Value $228Bull $434
$189 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Ningbo Shenglong Automotive Powertrain System Co · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score44 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-49% · below median

Toyota Motor · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score46 · below median
Fair value upside+21% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 28, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Toyota Motor as the more attractively valued of the two: Ningbo Shenglong Automotive Powertrain System Co trades at ¥16.48 versus a fair value of ¥8.47 (-49%), while Toyota Motor trades at $189 versus $228 (+21%).

Toyota Motor has the higher quality score (46/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.