EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Guangdong Songfa Ceramics vs Midea Group Co: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Guangdong Songfa Ceramics (603268) and Midea Group Co (000333) compare, as of Aug 8, 2026.

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Midea Group Co as the more attractively valued of the two: Guangdong Songfa Ceramics trades at ¥180 versus a fair value of ¥38.95 (-78%), while Midea Group Co trades at ¥85.32 versus ¥107 (+26%).
Guangdong Songfa Ceramics
603268.SHG · CNY · Consumer Discretionary
-78%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥180
Fair Value¥38.95
Quality51/100
Midea Group Co
000333.SHE · CNY · Consumer Discretionary
+26%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price¥85.32
Fair Value¥107
Quality61/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Guangdong Songfa CeramicsMidea Group Co
Valuation
78.2×P/E (TTM)14.2×
5.62×P/S (TTM)1.37×
16.38×P/B2.81×
27.8×EV/EBITDA10.6×
PEG3.00×
Dividend yield5.3%
Dividend per share¥4.30
Profitability
13%Net margin10%
18%Operating margin11%
66%Return on equity18%
11%Return on assets5%
Growth
199%Revenue growth (YoY)3%
330.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.0%
117.3%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.0%
Balance & size
0.39×Debt / equity0.07×
$23BMarket cap$93B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Guangdong Songfa Ceramics leads: 7 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Guangdong Songfa Ceramicsof which business quality 34 · market factors 85 Midea Group Coof which business quality 54 · market factors 74
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
47
52
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
86
62
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
54
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
63
72
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
0
51
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
58
93
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
94
57
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
100
80
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
29

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Guangdong Songfa Ceramics

Earnings-Based¥95.71
Dividend Discount¥5.71
Multiples¥54.33
Asset-Based¥6.52
Economic Profit¥45.70
Growth Earnings¥123

16 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Midea Group Co

DCF Models¥156
Earnings-Based¥82.49
Multiples¥110
Asset-Based¥21.46
Growth DCF¥147
Economic Profit¥77.14
Growth Earnings¥123

5 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Guangdong Songfa Ceramics
Bear ¥29.21Fair Value ¥38.95Bull ¥124
¥180 = current price (white tick)
Midea Group Co
Bear ¥80.41Fair Value ¥107Bull ¥168
¥85.32 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Guangdong Songfa Ceramics · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score51 · above median
Fair value upside-78% · bottom 25%

Midea Group Co · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score61 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+26% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Midea Group Co as the more attractively valued of the two: Guangdong Songfa Ceramics trades at ¥180 versus a fair value of ¥38.95 (-78%), while Midea Group Co trades at ¥85.32 versus ¥107 (+26%).

Midea Group Co has the higher quality score (61/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.