EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Zhejiang Kanglongda Special vs Nike: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Zhejiang Kanglongda Special (603665) and Nike (NKE) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Nike as the more attractively valued of the two: Zhejiang Kanglongda Special trades at ¥22.45 versus a fair value of ¥5.76 (-74%), while Nike trades at $41.70 versus $53.45 (+28%).
Zhejiang Kanglongda Special
603665.SHG · CNY · Consumer Discretionary
-74%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥22.45
Fair Value¥5.76
Quality45/100
Nike
NKE · USD · Consumer Discretionary
+28%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$41.70
Fair Value$53.45
Quality76/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Zhejiang Kanglongda SpecialNike
Valuation
P/E (TTM)20.4×
0.45×P/S (TTM)1.37×
0.95×P/B4.26×
4.1×EV/EBITDA14.1×
PEG1.69×
0.6%Dividend yield3.8%
¥0.16Dividend per share$1.63
Profitability
-1%Net margin7%
10%Operating margin12%
-10%Return on equity22%
0%Return on assets6%
Growth
-7%Revenue growth (YoY)-1%
0.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-3.2%
6.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)0.8%
Balance & size
0.27×Debt / equity0.54×
$625MMarket cap$63B
expensiveGrowth qualityweak

Even match: 6 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Zhejiang Kanglongda Specialof which business quality 42 · market factors 33 Nikeof which business quality 70 · market factors 23
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
33
70
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
50
34
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
21
56
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
18
78
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
91
95
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
63
52
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
25
16
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
12
2
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
79
92

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Zhejiang Kanglongda Special

DCF Models¥13.94
Earnings-Based¥3.66
Dividend Discount¥5.31
Multiples¥8.44
Asset-Based¥2.75
Economic Profit¥3.99
Growth Earnings¥9.87

17 of 17 models see the stock below the current price.

Nike

DCF Models$39.14
Earnings-Based$18.25
Dividend Discount$26.69
Multiples$36.33
Asset-Based$6.72
Growth DCF$37.37
Economic Profit$20.91
Growth Earnings$40.93

20 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Zhejiang Kanglongda Special
Bear ¥3.77Fair Value ¥5.76Bull ¥8.72
¥22.45 = current price (white tick)
Nike
Bear $36.23Fair Value $53.45Bull $66.82
$41.70 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Zhejiang Kanglongda Special · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score45 · below median
Fair value upside-74% · bottom 25%

Nike · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score76 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+28% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Nike as the more attractively valued of the two: Zhejiang Kanglongda Special trades at ¥22.45 versus a fair value of ¥5.76 (-74%), while Nike trades at $41.70 versus $53.45 (+28%).

Nike has the higher quality score (76/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.