STOCK COMPARISON
Silergy vs Nvidia: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Silergy (6415) and Nvidia (NVDA) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Nvidia as the less overvalued of the two: Silergy trades at TWD 442 versus a fair value of TWD 114 (-74%), while Nvidia trades at $224 versus $96.91 (-57%).
Silergy
6415.TW · TWD · Information Technology
-74%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 442
Fair ValueTWD 114
Quality53/100
Nvidia
NVDA · USD · Information Technology
-57%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$224
Fair Value$96.91
Quality74/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
SilergyNvidia
Valuation
83.3×P/E (TTM)32.3×
10.37×P/S (TTM)20.16×
5.44×P/B32.48×
67.5×EV/EBITDA30.9×
—PEG0.65×
0.5%Dividend yield0.0%
TWD 2.55Dividend per share$0.04
Profitability
15%Net margin63%
8%Operating margin66%
8%Return on equity114%
3%Return on assets53%
Growth
19%Revenue growth (YoY)85%
-7.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)100.0%
6.3%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)66.9%
Balance & size
0.07×Debt / equity0.05×
$6BMarket cap$5.1T
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy
Nvidia leads: 3 to 10 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Silergyof which business quality 55 · market factors 53
Nvidiaof which business quality 74 · market factors 53
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
40
96
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
31
34
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
25
81
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
94
83
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
59
32
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
0
26
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
86
61
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
57
72
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
81
91
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Silergy
DCF ModelsTWD 131
Earnings-BasedTWD 125
Dividend DiscountTWD 45.62
MultiplesTWD 112
Asset-BasedTWD 64.38
Growth DCFTWD 73.80
Economic ProfitTWD 79.60
Growth EarningsTWD 169
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Nvidia
DCF Models$128
Earnings-Based$148
Dividend Discount$0.77
Multiples$47.03
Asset-Based$4.35
Growth DCF$92.69
Economic Profit$106
Growth Earnings$179
25 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Silergy
Bear TWD 74.31Fair Value TWD 114Bull TWD 138
TWD 442 = current price (white tick)
Nvidia
Bear $53.60Fair Value $96.91Bull $178
$224 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Silergy · Information Technology
Quality score53 · below median
Fair value upside-74% · bottom 25%
Nvidia · Information Technology
Quality score74 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-57% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Nvidia as the less overvalued of the two: Silergy trades at TWD 442 versus a fair value of TWD 114 (-74%), while Nvidia trades at $224 versus $96.91 (-57%).
Nvidia has the higher quality score (74/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
