EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Kuangli Photoelectric Technology Co vs Procter & Gamble: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Kuangli Photoelectric Technology Co (6431) and Procter & Gamble (PG) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Kuangli Photoelectric Technology Co as the less overvalued of the two: Kuangli Photoelectric Technology Co trades at TWD 19.60 versus a fair value of TWD 17.07 (-13%), while Procter & Gamble trades at $146 versus $108 (-26%).
Kuangli Photoelectric Technology Co
6431.TW · TWD · Information Technology
-13%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 19.60
Fair ValueTWD 17.07
Quality28/100
Procter & Gamble
PG · USD · Consumer Staples
-26%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$146
Fair Value$108
Quality75/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Kuangli Photoelectric Technology CoProcter & Gamble
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)21.5×
0.15×P/S (TTM)3.95×
0.09×P/B6.58×
—EV/EBITDA14.3×
—PEG4.13×
—Dividend yield2.9%
—Dividend per share$4.23
Profitability
-55%Net margin19%
-38%Operating margin23%
-30%Return on equity31%
-8%Return on assets11%
Growth
-22%Revenue growth (YoY)7%
3.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)1.7%
19.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)3.5%
Balance & size
0.01×Debt / equity0.48×
$52MMarket cap$342B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Even match: 5 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Kuangli Photoelectric Technology Coof which business quality 28 · market factors 47 Procter & Gambleof which business quality 71 · market factors 54
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
5
73
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
34
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
6
65
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
53
70
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
96
85
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
66
95
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
35
40
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
47
33
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
91

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Kuangli Photoelectric Technology Co

Dividend DiscountTWD 15.69
Asset-BasedTWD 3.97

3 of 3 models see the stock below the current price.

Procter & Gamble

DCF Models$97.73
Earnings-Based$85.21
Dividend Discount$59.55
Multiples$120
Asset-Based$14.97
Growth DCF$74.21
Economic Profit$68.20
Growth Earnings$112

24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Kuangli Photoelectric Technology Co
Bear TWD 8.65Fair Value TWD 17.07Bull TWD 25.59
TWD 19.60 = current price (white tick)
Procter & Gamble
Bear $70.77Fair Value $108Bull $151
$146 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Kuangli Photoelectric Technology Co · Information Technology

Quality score28 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-13% · above median

Procter & Gamble · Consumer Staples

Quality score75 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-26% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Kuangli Photoelectric Technology Co as the less overvalued of the two: Kuangli Photoelectric Technology Co trades at TWD 19.60 versus a fair value of TWD 17.07 (-13%), while Procter & Gamble trades at $146 versus $108 (-26%).

Procter & Gamble has the higher quality score (75/100).

See the full analysis →
Kuangli Photoelectric Technology Co · Procter & Gamble

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Kuangli Photoelectric Technology Co

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to Procter & Gamble

Procter & Gamble vs AltriaWalmart vs AltriaCostco Wholesale vs AltriaCoca-Cola vs Altria
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.