EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Hangzhou EZVIZ Network Co. Ltd. A vs Apple: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Hangzhou EZVIZ Network Co. Ltd. A (688475) and Apple (AAPL) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Hangzhou EZVIZ Network Co. Ltd. A as the less overvalued of the two: Hangzhou EZVIZ Network Co. Ltd. A trades at ¥30.70 versus a fair value of ¥14.39 (-53%), while Apple trades at $313 versus $123 (-61%).
Hangzhou EZVIZ Network Co. Ltd. A
688475.SHG · CNY · Information Technology
-53%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥30.70
Fair Value¥14.39
Quality71/100
Apple
AAPL · USD · Information Technology
-61%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$313
Fair Value$123
Quality82/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Hangzhou EZVIZ Network Co. Ltd. AApple
Valuation
34.5×P/E (TTM)38.4×
3.53×P/S (TTM)10.24×
3.62×P/B—
22.8×EV/EBITDA29.2×
—PEG2.56×
1.6%Dividend yield0.3%
¥0.40Dividend per share$1.04
Profitability
10%Net margin27%
15%Operating margin32%
11%Return on equity141%
4%Return on assets26%
Growth
2%Revenue growth (YoY)17%
11.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)1.8%
13.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.7%
Balance & size
0.06×Debt / equity1.06×
$3BMarket cap$4.6T
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy

Hangzhou EZVIZ Network Co. Ltd. A leads: 7 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Hangzhou EZVIZ Network Co. Ltd. Aof which business quality 71 · market factors 52 Appleof which business quality 79 · market factors 75
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
46
97
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
55
68
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
74
77
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
99
57
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
71
75
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
84
65
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
38
71
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
39
93
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Hangzhou EZVIZ Network Co. Ltd. A

DCF Models¥22.13
Earnings-Based¥10.04
Dividend Discount¥6.17
Multiples¥14.61
Asset-Based¥4.93
Growth DCF¥23.95
Economic Profit¥10.32
Growth Earnings¥13.11

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Apple

DCF Models$170
Earnings-Based$98.15
Dividend Discount$20.06
Multiples$98.04
Asset-Based$3.36
Growth DCF$136
Economic Profit$87.59
Growth Earnings$147

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Hangzhou EZVIZ Network Co. Ltd. A
Bear ¥10.79Fair Value ¥14.39Bull ¥17.99
¥30.70 = current price (white tick)
Apple
Bear $86.44Fair Value $123Bull $192
$313 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Hangzhou EZVIZ Network Co. Ltd. A · Information Technology

Quality score71 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-53% · below median

Apple · Information Technology

Quality score82 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-61% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Hangzhou EZVIZ Network Co. Ltd. A as the less overvalued of the two: Hangzhou EZVIZ Network Co. Ltd. A trades at ¥30.70 versus a fair value of ¥14.39 (-53%), while Apple trades at $313 versus $123 (-61%).

Apple has the higher quality score (82/100).

See the full analysis →
Hangzhou EZVIZ Network Co. Ltd. A · Apple

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Hangzhou EZVIZ Network Co. Ltd. A

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to Apple

Amazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&t
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.