EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Hin Sang Group International Holding Co vs Procter & Gamble: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Hin Sang Group International Holding Co (6893) and Procter & Gamble (PG) compare, as of Aug 17, 2026.

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Procter & Gamble as the less overvalued of the two: Hin Sang Group International Holding Co trades at HK$0.23 versus a fair value of HK$0.09 (-61%), while Procter & Gamble trades at $145 versus $108 (-25%).
Hin Sang Group International Holding Co
6893.HK · HKD · Consumer Staples
-61%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.23
Fair ValueHK$0.09
Quality31/100
Procter & Gamble
PG · USD · Consumer Staples
-25%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$145
Fair Value$108
Quality75/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Hin Sang Group International Holding CoProcter & Gamble
Valuation
P/E (TTM)21.5×
0.26×P/S (TTM)3.95×
0.16×P/B6.58×
EV/EBITDA14.3×
PEG4.13×
Dividend yield2.9%
Dividend per share$4.23
Profitability
-42%Net margin19%
-4%Operating margin23%
-23%Return on equity31%
-1%Return on assets11%
Growth
8%Revenue growth (YoY)7%
-8.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)1.7%
-12.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)3.5%
Balance & size
0.84×Debt / equity0.48×
$25MMarket cap$342B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Procter & Gamble leads: 3 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Hin Sang Group International Holding Coof which business quality 30 · market factors 58 Procter & Gambleof which business quality 71 · market factors 52
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
4
73
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
36
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
6
65
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
10
70
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
94
85
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
95
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
59
37
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
64
29
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
91

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Hin Sang Group International Holding Co

Asset-BasedHK$0.10

1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

Procter & Gamble

DCF Models$97.73
Earnings-Based$85.21
Dividend Discount$59.55
Multiples$120
Asset-Based$14.97
Growth DCF$74.21
Economic Profit$68.20
Growth Earnings$112

24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Hin Sang Group International Holding Co
Bear HK$0.06Fair Value HK$0.09Bull HK$0.13
HK$0.23 = current price (white tick)
Procter & Gamble
Bear $70.77Fair Value $108Bull $151
$145 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Hin Sang Group International Holding Co · Consumer Staples

Quality score31 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-61% · bottom 25%

Procter & Gamble · Consumer Staples

Quality score75 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-25% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Procter & Gamble as the less overvalued of the two: Hin Sang Group International Holding Co trades at HK$0.23 versus a fair value of HK$0.09 (-61%), while Procter & Gamble trades at $145 versus $108 (-25%).

Procter & Gamble has the higher quality score (75/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.