Groundhog vs International Business Machines: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Groundhog (6906) and International Business Machines (IBM) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.
Head-to-head numbers
Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.
betterweakerfor reference, not scored
International Business Machines leads: 1 to 11 metric wins.
n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
What the models say
How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.
▲above the price, more than 15% above ●close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price ▼below the price, more than 15% below
| Model family | GroundhogPrice TWD 83.00 | International Business MachinesPrice $227 |
|---|---|---|
| DCF Models | ▼-46%below the priceTWD 44.58 | ▼-19%below the price$185 |
| Earnings-Based | ▼-65%below the priceTWD 29.35 | ▼-63%below the price$84.42 |
| Dividend Discount | ▼-61%below the priceTWD 32.20 | ▼-66%below the price$76.12 |
| Multiples | ▼-42%below the priceTWD 48.44 | ●-10%close to the price$205 |
| Asset-Based | ▼-82%below the priceTWD 15.13 | ▼-90%below the price$23.22 |
| Growth DCF | ▼-51%below the priceTWD 40.73 | ▼-37%below the price$142 |
| Economic Profit | ▼-69%below the priceTWD 25.66 | ▼-63%below the price$84.30 |
| Growth Earnings | ▼-49%below the priceTWD 42.03 | ●+4%close to the price$236 |
| Minimum | ▼-82%below the priceTWD 15.13 | ▼-90%below the price$23.22 |
| Maximum | ▼-42%below the priceTWD 48.44 | ●+4%close to the price$236 |
| Median | ▼-56%below the priceTWD 36.47 | ▼-50%below the price$113 |
| Geometric mean | ▼-60%below the priceTWD 32.85 | ▼-53%below the price$106 |
Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.
Groundhog: 25 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
International Business Machines: 20 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Groundhog · Information Technology
International Business Machines · Information Technology
Bottom line
As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees International Business Machines as the less overvalued of the two: Groundhog trades at TWD 83.00 versus a fair value of TWD 42.03 (-49%), while International Business Machines trades at $227 versus $187 (-18%).
Groundhog has the higher quality score (68/100).
Open International Business Machines live analysis →More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Related to Groundhog
Microsoft vs NvidiaApple vs MicrosoftNvidia vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingRelated to International Business Machines
Microsoft vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingBroadcom vs MicrosoftMicrosoft vs Micron TechnologyAdvanced Micro Devices vs MicrosoftSee the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.