EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Blue Moon Group Holdings vs Colgate-Palmolive: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Blue Moon Group Holdings (6993) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL) compare, as of Oct 1, 2026.

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Blue Moon Group Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: Blue Moon Group Holdings trades at HK$2.31 versus a fair value of HK$1.76 (−23.6%), while Colgate-Palmolive trades at $85.32 versus $56.16 (−34.2%).
Blue Moon Group Holdings
6993.HK · HKD · Consumer Staples
−23.6%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$2.31
Fair ValueHK$1.76
Quality63/100
Colgate-Palmolive
CL · USD · Consumer Staples
−34.2%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$85.32
Fair Value$56.16
Quality73/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Blue Moon Group HoldingsColgate-Palmolive
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)33.7×
n/aP/E ex one-offs (FY2025)23.1×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)20.8×
0.21×P/S (TTM)3.27×
0.23×P/Bn/a
n/aEV/EBITDA14.9×
1.83×PEG1.57×
−23.6%Fair value upside−34.2%
7.8%Dividend yield2.4%
HK$0.18Dividend per share$2.09
Profitability
-11.4%Operating margin21.0%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)0.91×
-1.2%Return on equity267.4%
-1.2%Return on assets15.8%
Growth
-5.1%Revenue growth (YoY)4.9%
1.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)4.3%
3.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.4%
n/aValue creation/yr+6.4%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)16.3×
n/aDebt / equity18.83×
$2BMarket cap$69B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy
The P/E excluding one-off items is only shown where the special items are documented in the accounts (our own raw data or SEC filings). If one side lacks it, the reported P/E stays scored.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.

Colgate-Palmolive leads: 3 to 6 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Blue Moon Group Holdingsof which business quality 62 · market factors 35 Colgate-Palmoliveof which business quality 70 · market factors 58
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
34
84
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
61
24
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
13
83
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
100
45
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
97
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
75
92
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
28
43
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
46
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
92
90

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyBlue Moon Group HoldingsPrice HK$2.31Colgate-PalmolivePrice $85.32
DCF Modelsn/a−37.2%below the price$53.54
Earnings-Basedn/a−55.5%below the price$37.97
Dividend Discount−33.2%below the priceHK$1.54−64.0%below the price$30.70
Multiplesn/a−43.1%below the price$48.54
Asset-Based−62.3%below the priceHK$0.87−99.6%below the price$0.31
Growth DCFn/a−37.9%below the price$53.01
Economic Profitn/a−73.0%below the price$23.01
Growth Earningsn/a−48.3%below the price$44.10
Minimum−62.3%below the priceHK$0.87−99.6%below the price$0.31
Maximum−33.2%below the priceHK$1.54−37.2%below the price$53.54
Median−47.7%below the priceHK$1.21−51.9%below the price$41.04
Geometric mean−49.8%below the priceHK$1.16−74.5%below the price$21.77

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Blue Moon Group Holdings: 3 of 3 models see the stock below the current price.

Colgate-Palmolive: 24 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Blue Moon Group Holdings
Price HK$2.31
Fair Value HK$1.76
Bear HK$1.10Bull HK$2.44
Colgate-Palmolive
Price $85.32
Fair Value $56.16
Bear $40.06Bull $70.20

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Blue Moon Group Holdings · Consumer Staples

Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−23.6% · below median

Colgate-Palmolive · Consumer Staples

Quality score73 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−34.2% · below median

Bottom line

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Blue Moon Group Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: Blue Moon Group Holdings trades at HK$2.31 versus a fair value of HK$1.76 (−23.6%), while Colgate-Palmolive trades at $85.32 versus $56.16 (−34.2%).

Colgate-Palmolive has the higher quality score (73/100).

Open Blue Moon Group Holdings live analysis →
Blue Moon Group Holdings · Colgate-Palmolive

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Blue Moon Group Holdings

Microsoft vs NvidiaApple vs MicrosoftMicrosoft vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingAlphabet Inc Class C vs Meta Platforms

Related to Colgate-Palmolive

Broadcom vs MicrosoftMicrosoft vs Micron TechnologyAdvanced Micro Devices vs MicrosoftIntel vs Microsoft
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.