EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Kingcan Holdings vs Stora Enso Oyj ser. R: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Kingcan Holdings (8411) and Stora Enso Oyj ser. R (STE-R) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Stora Enso Oyj ser. R as the more attractively valued of the two: Kingcan Holdings trades at TWD 13.05 versus a fair value of TWD 1.56 (-88%), while Stora Enso Oyj ser. R trades at SEK 106 versus SEK 126 (+19%).
Kingcan Holdings
8411.TW · TWD · Materials
-88%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 13.05
Fair ValueTWD 1.56
Quality39/100
Stora Enso Oyj ser. R
STE-R.ST · SEK · Materials
+19%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceSEK 106
Fair ValueSEK 126
Quality55/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Kingcan HoldingsStora Enso Oyj ser. R
Valuation
P/E (TTM)11.7×
P/S (TTM)0.94×
P/B0.81×
1.0×EV/EBITDA17.1×
PEG40.97×
0.8%Dividend yield
TWD 0.10Dividend per share
Profitability
0%Net margin7%
3%Operating margin5%
0%Return on equity6%
0%Return on assets1%
Growth
24%Revenue growth (YoY)-0%
1.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-7.2%
9.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)1.7%
Balance & size
0.41×Debt / equity0.29×
$89MMarket cap$9B
mixedGrowth qualityweak

Stora Enso Oyj ser. R leads: 4 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Kingcan Holdingsof which business quality 37 · market factors 66 Stora Enso Oyj ser. Rof which business quality 52 · market factors 49
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
17
33
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
35
57
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
14
19
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
41
63
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
97
88
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
100
81
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
44
38
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
64
33
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
55
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Kingcan Holdings

DCF ModelsTWD 9.72
Dividend DiscountTWD 0.82
MultiplesTWD 17.13
Asset-BasedTWD 18.01

4 of 7 models see the stock below the current price.

Stora Enso Oyj ser. R

DCF ModelsSEK 4.59
Earnings-BasedSEK 8.58
Dividend DiscountSEK 2.91
MultiplesSEK 15.25
Asset-BasedSEK 9.34
Economic ProfitSEK 10.63
Growth EarningsSEK 11.64

15 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Kingcan Holdings
Bear TWD 1.56Fair Value TWD 1.56Bull TWD 6.24
TWD 13.05 = current price (white tick)
Stora Enso Oyj ser. R
Bear SEK 97.15Fair Value SEK 126Bull SEK 141
SEK 106 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Kingcan Holdings · Materials

Quality score39 · below median
Fair value upside-88% · bottom 25%

Stora Enso Oyj ser. R · Materials

Quality score55 · above median
Fair value upside+19% · Top 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Stora Enso Oyj ser. R as the more attractively valued of the two: Kingcan Holdings trades at TWD 13.05 versus a fair value of TWD 1.56 (-88%), while Stora Enso Oyj ser. R trades at SEK 106 versus SEK 126 (+19%).

Stora Enso Oyj ser. R has the higher quality score (55/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.