EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Wing Fung Group Asia vs Trane Technologies: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Wing Fung Group Asia (8526) and Trane Technologies (TT) compare, as of Oct 1, 2026.

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Trane Technologies as the less overvalued of the two: Wing Fung Group Asia trades at HK$0.45 versus a fair value of HK$0.21 (−53.3%), while Trane Technologies trades at $452 versus $215 (−52.3%).
Wing Fung Group Asia
8526.HK · HKD · Industrials
−53.3%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.45
Fair ValueHK$0.21
Quality38/100
Trane Technologies
TT · USD · Industrials
−52.3%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$452
Fair Value$215
Quality73/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Wing Fung Group AsiaTrane Technologies
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)33.7×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)25.8×
n/aMedian P/E at FY-end (6 FY, ex one-offs where documented)31.3×
0.05×P/S (TTM)4.54×
0.23×P/B11.72× · book value is mostly goodwill
n/aEV/EBITDA23.9×
n/aPEG1.55×
−53.3%Fair value upside−52.3%
n/aDividend yield0.9%
n/aDividend per share$3.98
Profitability
-7.4%Operating margin19.3%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.51×
-58.1%Return on equity36.6%
-14.3%Return on assets11.0%
Growth
97.1%Revenue growth (YoY)10.6%
-7.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.1%
-8.0%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)11.4%
n/aValue creation/yr+24.8%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)17.4×
n/aDebt / equity0.46×
$10MMarket cap$101B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Trane Technologies, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 6 fiscal years (2020 to 2025), reported earnings, FY2020, FY2023, FY2025 ex one-offs: 31.3.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.

Trane Technologies leads: 1 to 6 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Wing Fung Group Asiaof which business quality 38 · market factors 84 Trane Technologiesof which business quality 70 · market factors 51
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
20
76
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
9
52
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
3
61
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
48
71
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
70
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
58
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
100
44
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
95
53
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
82
88

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyWing Fung Group AsiaPrice HK$0.45Trane TechnologiesPrice $452
DCF Modelsn/a−50.3%below the price$225
Earnings-Basedn/a−75.2%below the price$112
Dividend Discountn/a−85.9%below the price$63.65
Multiplesn/a−51.3%below the price$220
Asset-Based−60.0%below the priceHK$0.18−94.2%below the price$26.19
Growth DCFn/a−56.1%below the price$199
Economic Profitn/a−70.8%below the price$132
Growth Earningsn/a−47.8%below the price$236
Minimum−60.0%below the priceHK$0.18−94.2%below the price$26.19
Maximum−60.0%below the priceHK$0.18−47.8%below the price$236
Median−60.0%below the priceHK$0.18−63.4%below the price$165
Geometric mean−60.0%below the priceHK$0.18−72.5%below the price$124

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Wing Fung Group Asia: 1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

Trane Technologies: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Wing Fung Group Asia
Price HK$0.45
Fair Value HK$0.21
Bear HK$0.14Bull HK$0.26
Trane Technologies
Price $452
Fair Value $215
Bear $140Bull $307

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Wing Fung Group Asia · Industrials

Quality score38 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside−53.3% · bottom 25%

Trane Technologies · Industrials

Quality score73 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−52.3% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Trane Technologies as the less overvalued of the two: Wing Fung Group Asia trades at HK$0.45 versus a fair value of HK$0.21 (−53.3%), while Trane Technologies trades at $452 versus $215 (−52.3%).

Trane Technologies has the higher quality score (73/100).

Open Trane Technologies live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.