Addvalue Technologies vs Cisco Systems: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Addvalue Technologies (A31) and Cisco Systems (CSCO) compare, as of Aug 18, 2026.
As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cisco Systems as the less overvalued of the two: Addvalue Technologies trades at S$0.15 versus a fair value of S$0.03 (-83%), while Cisco Systems trades at $113 versus $80.31 (-29%).
Addvalue Technologies
A31.SG · SGD · Information Technology
-83%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceS$0.15
Fair ValueS$0.03
Quality66/100
Cisco Systems
CSCO · USD · Information Technology
-29%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$113
Fair Value$80.31
Quality74/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Addvalue TechnologiesCisco Systems
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)40.4×
16.60×P/S (TTM)7.87×
22.64×P/B10.21×
94.4×EV/EBITDA29.0×
0.73×PEG1.68×
—Dividend yield1.4%
—Dividend per share$1.65
Profitability
19%Net margin20%
10%Operating margin25%
37%Return on equity25%
8%Return on assets7%
Growth
64%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
48.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)3.2%
56.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)2.8%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.49×
$412MMarket cap$478B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Addvalue Technologies leads: 6 to 5 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Addvalue Technologiesof which business quality 68 · market factors 70Cisco Systemsof which business quality 70 · market factors 76
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
75
58
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
90
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
24
75
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
33
60
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
86
81
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
85
87
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
19
97
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Addvalue Technologies
DCF ModelsS$0.04
Earnings-BasedS$0.04
MultiplesS$0.03
Growth DCFS$0.04
Economic ProfitS$0.02
Growth EarningsS$0.06
23 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.
Cisco Systems
DCF Models$68.44
Earnings-Based$25.45
Dividend Discount$31.20
Multiples$53.39
Asset-Based$7.96
Growth DCF$58.14
Economic Profit$28.50
Growth Earnings$50.63
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Addvalue Technologies
Bear S$0.02Fair Value S$0.03Bull S$0.03
S$0.15 = current price (white tick)
Cisco Systems
Bear $51.06Fair Value $80.31Bull $102
$113 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Addvalue Technologies · Information Technology
Quality score66 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-83% · bottom 25%
Cisco Systems · Information Technology
Quality score74 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-29% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cisco Systems as the less overvalued of the two: Addvalue Technologies trades at S$0.15 versus a fair value of S$0.03 (-83%), while Cisco Systems trades at $113 versus $80.31 (-29%).
Cisco Systems has the higher quality score (74/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
