ABAS Protect AB vs Trane Technologies: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how ABAS Protect AB (ABAS) and Trane Technologies (TT) compare, as of Aug 26, 2026.
As of Aug 26, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ABAS Protect AB as the less overvalued of the two: ABAS Protect AB trades at SEK 8.95 versus a fair value of SEK 6.94 (-22%), while Trane Technologies trades at $455 versus $209 (-54%).
ABAS Protect AB
ABAS.ST · SEK · Industrials
-22%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceSEK 8.95
Fair ValueSEK 6.94
Quality36/100
Trane Technologies
TT · USD · Industrials
-54%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$455
Fair Value$209
Quality74/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
ABAS Protect ABTrane Technologies
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)35.2×
0.06×P/S (TTM)4.81×
0.14×P/B12.08×
—EV/EBITDA25.1×
—PEG2.00×
9.7%Dividend yield0.9%
—Dividend per share$3.87
Profitability
-4%Net margin13%
2%Operating margin16%
-9%Return on equity37%
-2%Return on assets11%
Growth
-8%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
-0.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.1%
8.3%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)11.4%
Balance & size
0.70×Debt / equity0.46×
$5MMarket cap$104B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy
Trane Technologies leads: 3 to 8 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
ABAS Protect ABof which business quality 37 · market factors 54Trane Technologiesof which business quality 71 · market factors 51
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
35
76
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
7
52
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
80
70
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
79
58
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
43
45
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
44
56
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
65
100
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
ABAS Protect AB
Dividend DiscountSEK 6.35
Asset-BasedSEK 3.57
3 of 3 models see the stock below the current price.
Trane Technologies
DCF Models$237
Earnings-Based$126
Dividend Discount$66.00
Multiples$219
Asset-Based$26.07
Growth DCF$205
Economic Profit$157
Growth Earnings$253
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
ABAS Protect AB
Bear SEK 6.05Fair Value SEK 6.94Bull SEK 7.90
SEK 8.95 = current price (white tick)
Trane Technologies
Bear $134Fair Value $209Bull $306
$455 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
ABAS Protect AB · Industrials
Quality score36 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-22% · below median
Trane Technologies · Industrials
Quality score74 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-54% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 26, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ABAS Protect AB as the less overvalued of the two: ABAS Protect AB trades at SEK 8.95 versus a fair value of SEK 6.94 (-22%), while Trane Technologies trades at $455 versus $209 (-54%).
Trane Technologies has the higher quality score (74/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.