Abbott Laboratories vs Gilead Sciences: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Gilead Sciences (GILD) compare, as of Sep 30, 2026.
Head-to-head numbers
Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.
betterweakerfor reference, not scored
Even match: 7 to 7 metric wins.
n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
What the models say
How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.
▲above the price, more than 15% above ●close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price ▼below the price, more than 15% below
| Model family | Abbott LaboratoriesPrice $101 | Gilead SciencesPrice $152 |
|---|---|---|
| DCF Models | ▼−25.9%below the price$74.80 | ▲+48.9%above the price$227 |
| Earnings-Based | ▼−70.9%below the price$29.42 | ●−4.9%close to the price$145 |
| Dividend Discount | ▼−60.7%below the price$39.73 | ▼−62.7%below the price$56.80 |
| Multiples | ▼−30.0%below the price$70.72 | ▼−23.9%below the price$116 |
| Asset-Based | ▼−80.1%below the price$20.05 | ▼−92.0%below the price$12.22 |
| Growth DCF | ▼−32.1%below the price$68.58 | ▲+18.7%above the price$181 |
| Economic Profit | ▼−62.9%below the price$37.49 | ▼−35.5%below the price$98.23 |
| Growth Earnings | ▼−30.4%below the price$70.25 | ▲+30.6%above the price$199 |
| Minimum | ▼−80.1%below the price$20.05 | ▼−92.0%below the price$12.22 |
| Maximum | ▼−25.9%below the price$74.80 | ▲+48.9%above the price$227 |
| Median | ▼−46.4%below the price$54.15 | ●−14.4%close to the price$130 |
| Geometric mean | ▼−53.8%below the price$46.64 | ▼−34.9%below the price$99.10 |
Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.
Abbott Laboratories: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Gilead Sciences: 16 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Abbott Laboratories · Health Care
Gilead Sciences · Health Care
Bottom line
As of Sep 30, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Gilead Sciences as the more attractively valued of the two: Abbott Laboratories trades at $101 versus a fair value of $74.79 (−25.9%), while Gilead Sciences trades at $152 versus $199 (+30.6%).
Gilead Sciences has the higher quality score (81/100).
Open Gilead Sciences live analysis →More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.