EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Credit Agricole vs Quanta Services: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Credit Agricole (ACA) and Quanta Services (PWR) compare, as of Sep 5, 2026.

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Credit Agricole as the more attractively valued of the two: Credit Agricole trades at €18.81 versus a fair value of €26.70 (+42%), while Quanta Services trades at $620 versus $144 (-77%).
Credit Agricole
ACA.PA · EUR · Financials
+42%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price€18.81
Fair Value€26.70
Quality61/100
Quanta Services
PWR · USD · Industrials
-77%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$620
Fair Value$144
Quality50/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Credit AgricoleQuanta Services
Valuation
8.4×P/E (TTM)91.8×
2.38×P/S (TTM)3.33×
0.91×P/B11.22×
5.6×EV/EBITDA39.5×
4.06×PEG1.84×
+42.0%Fair value upside−76.8%
9.0%Dividend yield0.1%
€1.70Dividend per share$0.42
Profitability
38%Operating margin4%
0.96×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.02×
9%Return on equity14%
0%Return on assets5%
Growth
-1%Revenue growth (YoY)26%
35.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)18.4%
22.0%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)20.4%
+15.7%Value creation/yr+16.8%
Balance & size
0.3×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)6.3×
2.45×Debt / equity0.59×
$63BMarket cap$100B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Quanta Services leads: 5 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Credit Agricoleof which business quality 55 · market factors 74 Quanta Servicesof which business quality 52 · market factors 61
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
21
45
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
58
44
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
83
59
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
24
55
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
91
36
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
81
41
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
66
62
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
81
80
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
78
72

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyCredit AgricolePrice €18.81Quanta ServicesPrice $620
DCF Modelsn/a-66%below the price$212
Earnings-Basedn/a-82%below the price$111
Dividend Discount+3%close to the price€19.36-99%below the price$7.09
Multiples+66%above the price€31.29-79%below the price$130
Asset-Based-18%below the price€15.39-94%below the price$39.91
Growth DCFn/a-63%below the price$227
Economic Profit+20%above the price€22.66-90%below the price$64.82
Growth Earningsn/a-74%below the price$163
Minimum-18%below the price€15.39-99%below the price$7.09
Maximum+66%above the price€31.29-63%below the price$227
Median+12%close to the price€21.01-81%below the price$121
Geometric mean+14%close to the price€21.44-87%below the price$82.21

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Credit Agricole: 2 of 6 models see the stock below the current price.

Quanta Services: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Credit Agricole
Bear €20.03Fair Value €26.70Bull €33.37
€18.81 = current price (white tick)
Quanta Services
Bear $107Fair Value $144Bull $180
$620 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Credit Agricole · Financials

Quality score61 · above median
Fair value upside+42% · Top 25%

Quanta Services · Industrials

Quality score50 · below median
Fair value upside-77% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Credit Agricole as the more attractively valued of the two: Credit Agricole trades at €18.81 versus a fair value of €26.70 (+42%), while Quanta Services trades at $620 versus $144 (-77%).

Credit Agricole has the higher quality score (61/100).

See the full analysis →
Credit Agricole · Quanta Services

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Credit Agricole

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs PDD Holdings

Related to Quanta Services

Amazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&tMeta Platforms vs NetEase
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.