EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Aebi Schmidt Holding vs Caterpillar: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Aebi Schmidt Holding (AEBI) and Caterpillar (CAT) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Aebi Schmidt Holding as the less overvalued of the two: Aebi Schmidt Holding trades at $11.60 versus a fair value of $6.11 (-47%), while Caterpillar trades at $812 versus $308 (-62%).
Aebi Schmidt Holding
AEBI · USD · Industrials
-47%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$11.60
Fair Value$6.11
Quality49/100
Caterpillar
CAT · USD · Industrials
-62%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$812
Fair Value$308
Quality65/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Aebi Schmidt HoldingCaterpillar
Valuation
105.5×P/E (TTM)40.8×
0.55×P/S (TTM)6.11×
1.18×P/B20.27×
11.3×EV/EBITDA31.1×
n/aPEG2.25×
−47.3%Fair value upside−62.1%
0.6%Dividend yield0.7%
$0.08Dividend per share$6.04
Profitability
4%Operating margin18%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.52×
1%Return on equity51%
3%Return on assets9%
Growth
83%Revenue growth (YoY)22%
n/aAvg. growth/yr (3Y)4.4%
n/aAvg. growth/yr (5Y)10.1%
n/aValue creation/yr+12.7%
Balance & size
1.7×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)10.9×
0.67×Debt / equity1.44×
$959MMarket cap$432B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Caterpillar leads: 5 to 6 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Aebi Schmidt Holdingof which business quality 46 · market factors 31 Caterpillarof which business quality 62 · market factors 57
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
27
61
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
37
22
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
15
68
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
36
51
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
72
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
21
32
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
41
61
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
28
79
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
100
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyAebi Schmidt HoldingPrice $11.60CaterpillarPrice $812
DCF Models+77%above the price$20.56-53%below the price$383
Earnings-Based-64%below the price$4.12-81%below the price$151
Dividend Discountn/a-86%below the price$111
Multiples-61%below the price$4.55-61%below the price$314
Asset-Based-39%below the price$7.04-96%below the price$31.01
Growth DCFn/a-57%below the price$345
Economic Profit-65%below the price$4.04-73%below the price$220
Growth Earnings-53%below the price$5.45-56%below the price$361
Minimum-65%below the price$4.04-96%below the price$31.01
Maximum+77%above the price$20.56-53%below the price$383
Median-57%below the price$5.00-67%below the price$267
Geometric mean-46%below the price$6.25-77%below the price$190

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Aebi Schmidt Holding: 13 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Caterpillar: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Aebi Schmidt Holding
Price $11.60
Fair Value $6.11
Bear $2.30Bull $6.11
Caterpillar
Price $812
Fair Value $308
Bear $204Bull $462

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Aebi Schmidt Holding · Industrials

Quality score49 · below median
Fair value upside-47% · below median

Caterpillar · Industrials

Quality score65 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-62% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Aebi Schmidt Holding as the less overvalued of the two: Aebi Schmidt Holding trades at $11.60 versus a fair value of $6.11 (-47%), while Caterpillar trades at $812 versus $308 (-62%).

Caterpillar has the higher quality score (65/100).

Open Aebi Schmidt Holding live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.