Agnico Eagle Mines vs BHP: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) and BHP (BHP) compare, as of Nov 5, 2026.
Head-to-head numbers
Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.
betterweakerfor reference, not scored
Agnico Eagle Mines leads: 12 to 4 metric wins.
Group holding company: BHP (75 %) consolidates subsidiaries in full but owns only the stated share. Revenue, EBITDA and margin ratios are therefore restated for its own shareholders; earnings per share, P/E and return on equity already were.
n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
What the models say
How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.
▲above the price, more than 15% above ●close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price ▼below the price, more than 15% below
| Model family | Agnico Eagle MinesPrice $189 | BHPPrice A$57.62 |
|---|---|---|
| DCF Models | ▲+32.1%above the price$250 | ▼−15.7%below the priceA$48.60 |
| Earnings-Based | ●−7.6%close to the price$175 | ▼−27.5%below the priceA$41.80 |
| Dividend Discount | ▼−85.2%below the price$28.00 | ▼−52.9%below the priceA$27.17 |
| Multiples | ▼−32.6%below the price$127 | ▼−23.9%below the priceA$43.87 |
| Asset-Based | ▼−85.6%below the price$27.28 | ▼−84.4%below the priceA$9.00 |
| Growth DCF | ●+2.2%close to the price$193 | ▼−31.6%below the priceA$39.44 |
| Economic Profit | ▼−34.1%below the price$125 | ▼−39.4%below the priceA$34.92 |
| Growth Earnings | ▲+16.4%above the price$220 | ▼−29.9%below the priceA$40.39 |
| Matching families | 8 of 8 | |
| Minimum | ▼−85.6%below the price$27.28 | ▼−84.4%below the priceA$9.00 |
| Maximum | ▲+32.1%above the price$250 | ▼−15.7%below the priceA$48.60 |
| Median | ▼−20.1%below the price$151 | ▼−30.7%below the priceA$39.91 |
| Geometric mean | ▼−41.5%below the price$111 | ▼−43.8%below the priceA$32.39 |
| Ahead family by family | 5 of 8 | 3 of 8 |
Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean only use the families both stocks have (matching families: 8 of 8), so a family without a value on one side does not distort the comparison. Ahead in a family is the stock whose fair value there sits higher relative to its price. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.
Family by family: Agnico Eagle Mines is ahead in 5 of 8 shared families, BHP in 3.
Agnico Eagle Mines: 17 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
BHP: 21 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Agnico Eagle Mines · Materials
BHP · Materials
Bottom line
As of Nov 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Agnico Eagle Mines as the more attractively valued of the two: Agnico Eagle Mines trades at $189 versus a fair value of $220 (+16.4%), while BHP trades at A$57.62 versus A$47.21 (−18.1%).
Agnico Eagle Mines has the higher quality score (73/100).
Open Agnico Eagle Mines live analysis →More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.