STOCK COMPARISON
Aker ASA vs Citic Pacific: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Aker ASA (AKER) and Citic Pacific (0267) compare, as of Aug 8, 2026.
As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Citic Pacific as the more attractively valued of the two: Aker ASA trades at NOK 1,304 versus a fair value of NOK 882 (-32%), while Citic Pacific trades at HK$11.94 versus HK$22.56 (+89%).
Aker ASA
AKER.OL · NOK · Financials
-32%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceNOK 1,304
Fair ValueNOK 882
Quality72/100
Citic Pacific
0267.HK · HKD · Industrials
+89%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$11.94
Fair ValueHK$22.56
Quality47/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Aker ASACitic Pacific
Valuation
3.2×P/E (TTM)4.8×
2.23×P/S (TTM)0.34×
1.92×P/B0.37×
4.3×EV/EBITDA2.8×
1.88×PEG1.76×
2.5%Dividend yield5.2%
NOK 29.00Dividend per shareHK$0.59
Profitability
69%Net margin6%
82%Operating margin30%
45%Return on equity8%
16%Return on assets1%
Growth
361%Revenue growth (YoY)-2%
23.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.2%
37.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.9%
Balance & size
0.83×Debt / equity2.03×
$9BMarket cap$41B
mixedGrowth qualityexpensive
Aker ASA leads: 9 to 5 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Aker ASAof which business quality 52 · market factors 90
Citic Pacificof which business quality 39 · market factors 50
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
38
20
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
67
54
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
43
23
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
35
20
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
68
69
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
83
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
90
37
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
98
46
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
82
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Aker ASA
DCF ModelsNOK 645
Earnings-BasedNOK 1,192
Dividend DiscountNOK 1,868
MultiplesNOK 502
Asset-BasedNOK 422
Growth DCFNOK 253
Economic ProfitNOK 580
Growth EarningsNOK 1,544
20 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Citic Pacific
DCF ModelsHK$43.54
Earnings-BasedHK$38.05
Dividend DiscountHK$11.60
MultiplesHK$44.73
Asset-BasedHK$20.07
Economic ProfitHK$26.67
Growth EarningsHK$53.29
1 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Aker ASA
Bear NOK 661Fair Value NOK 882Bull NOK 1,102
NOK 1,304 = current price (white tick)
Citic Pacific
Bear HK$16.92Fair Value HK$22.56Bull HK$28.20
HK$11.94 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Aker ASA · Financials
Quality score72 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-32% · below median
Citic Pacific · Industrials
Quality score47 · below median
Fair value upside+89% · Top 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Citic Pacific as the more attractively valued of the two: Aker ASA trades at NOK 1,304 versus a fair value of NOK 882 (-32%), while Citic Pacific trades at HK$11.94 versus HK$22.56 (+89%).
Aker ASA has the higher quality score (72/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
