EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Anaergia vs Waste Management: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Anaergia (ANRG) and Waste Management (WM) compare, as of Sep 29, 2026.

As of Sep 29, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Waste Management as the more attractively valued of the two: Anaergia trades at C$2.49 versus a fair value of C$0.54 (−78.2%), while Waste Management trades at $206 versus $228 (+10.2%).
Anaergia
ANRG.TO · CAD · Industrials
−78.2%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceC$2.49
Fair ValueC$0.54
Quality40/100
Waste Management
WM · USD · Industrials
+10.2%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$206
Fair Value$228
Quality56/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

AnaergiaWaste Management
Valuation
49.8×P/E (TTM)29.2×
62.3×P/E ex one-offs (FY2025)29.1×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)22.6×
2.02×P/S (TTM)3.24×
Negative equityP/B8.33× · book value is mostly goodwill
n/aEV/EBITDA13.5×
n/aPEG1.90×
−78.2%Fair value upside+10.2%
n/aDividend yield1.7%
n/aDividend per share$3.54
Profitability
-2.7%Operating margin19.0%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.12×
Negative equityReturn on equity29.8%
-1.0%Return on assets6.6%
Growth
122.0%Revenue growth (YoY)4.0%
3.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.6%
7.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.6%
−23.2%Value creation/yr+13.9%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)5.1×
Negative equityDebt / equity2.22×
$300MMarket cap$83B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy
The P/E excluding one-off items is only shown where the special items are documented in the accounts (our own raw data or SEC filings). If one side lacks it, the reported P/E stays scored.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.

Waste Management leads: 1 to 8 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Anaergiaof which business quality 40 · market factors 24 Waste Managementof which business quality 53 · market factors 51
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
36
50
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
70
56
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
29
64
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
31
33
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
97
35
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
1
94
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
35
35
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
32
28
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
0
84

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyAnaergiaPrice C$2.49Waste ManagementPrice $206
DCF Models−66.7%below the priceC$0.83−36.4%below the price$131
Earnings-Based−81.9%below the priceC$0.45−60.9%below the price$80.76
Multiples−72.3%below the priceC$0.69−38.0%below the price$128
Asset-Basedn/a−91.9%below the price$16.75
Growth DCF−74.1%below the priceC$0.65−40.8%below the price$122
Economic Profitn/a−66.6%below the price$68.90
Growth Earnings−70.3%below the priceC$0.74−37.7%below the price$129
Minimum−81.9%below the priceC$0.45−91.9%below the price$16.75
Maximum−66.7%below the priceC$0.83−36.4%below the price$131
Median−72.3%below the priceC$0.69−40.8%below the price$122
Geometric mean−73.6%below the priceC$0.66−60.4%below the price$81.85

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Anaergia: 15 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Waste Management: 22 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Anaergia
Price C$2.49
Fair Value C$0.54
Bear C$0.42Bull C$0.71
Waste Management
Price $206
Fair Value $228
Bear $122Bull $296

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Anaergia · Industrials

Quality score40 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside−78.2% · bottom 25%

Waste Management · Industrials

Quality score56 · above median
Fair value upside+10.2% · above median

Bottom line

As of Sep 29, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Waste Management as the more attractively valued of the two: Anaergia trades at C$2.49 versus a fair value of C$0.54 (−78.2%), while Waste Management trades at $206 versus $228 (+10.2%).

Waste Management has the higher quality score (56/100).

Open Waste Management live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.