EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A vs Lahav LR Real Estate: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A (ATD) and Lahav LR Real Estate (LAHAV) compare, as of Sep 24, 2026.

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A as the more attractively valued of the two: Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A trades at C$78.49 versus a fair value of C$106 (+35%), while Lahav LR Real Estate trades at ILS 11.62 versus ILS 4.57 (-61%).
Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A
ATD.TO · CAD · Consumer Discretionary
+35%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceC$78.49
Fair ValueC$106
Quality63/100
Lahav LR Real Estate
LAHAV.TA · ILA · Real Estate
-61%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceILS 11.62
Fair ValueILS 4.57
Quality44/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc ALahav LR Real Estate
Valuation
16.4×P/E (TTM)14.2×
0.77×P/S (TTM)2.16×
3.66×P/B0.84×
10.6×EV/EBITDA22.0×
1.52×PEGn/a
+34.5%Fair value upside−60.7%
1.0%Dividend yield2.1%
C$0.82Dividend per shareILS 0.25
Profitability
9%Operating margin11%
0.75×EBIT margin trend (5Y)0.01×
20%Return on equity17%
7%Return on assets1%
Growth
-22%Revenue growth (YoY)2%
2.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)222.9%
10.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)115.1%
+7.6%Value creation/yr+3.9%
Balance & size
6.4×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)0.9×
0.64×Debt / equity0.64×
$59BMarket cap$1B
healthyGrowth qualitymixed
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A leads: 6 to 4 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc Aof which business quality 60 · market factors 53 Lahav LR Real Estateof which business quality 43 · market factors 79
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
62
46
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
44
73
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
48
21
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
57
45
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
60
49
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
79
71
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
41
78
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
42
91
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
100
32

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyAlimentation Couchen Tard Inc APrice C$78.49Lahav LR Real EstatePrice ILS 11.62
DCF Models+19%above the priceC$93.56-63%below the priceILS 4.34
Earnings-Based-43%below the priceC$44.54n/a
Dividend Discount-86%below the priceC$10.60-76%below the priceILS 2.78
Multiples-15%close to the priceC$66.75-76%below the priceILS 2.76
Asset-Based-85%below the priceC$11.80-73%below the priceILS 3.08
Growth DCF+8%close to the priceC$85.07-65%below the priceILS 4.05
Economic Profit-48%below the priceC$41.05-46%below the priceILS 6.22
Growth Earnings-11%close to the priceC$70.03n/a
Minimum-86%below the priceC$10.60-76%below the priceILS 2.76
Maximum+19%above the priceC$93.56-46%below the priceILS 6.22
Median-29%below the priceC$55.65-69%below the priceILS 3.56
Geometric mean-47%below the priceC$41.33-68%below the priceILS 3.70

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A: 14 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Lahav LR Real Estate: 16 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A
Price C$78.49
Fair Value C$106
Bear C$69.02Bull C$214
Lahav LR Real Estate
Price ILS 11.62
Fair Value ILS 4.57
Bear ILS 1.69Bull ILS 9.37

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+35% · above median

Lahav LR Real Estate · Real Estate

Quality score44 · below median
Fair value upside-61% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A as the more attractively valued of the two: Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A trades at C$78.49 versus a fair value of C$106 (+35%), while Lahav LR Real Estate trades at ILS 11.62 versus ILS 4.57 (-61%).

Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A has the higher quality score (63/100).

Open Alimentation Couchen Tard Inc A live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.