EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Yongmao Holdings vs Caterpillar: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Yongmao Holdings (BKX) and Caterpillar (CAT) compare, as of Aug 18, 2026.

As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Yongmao Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: Yongmao Holdings trades at S$0.68 versus a fair value of S$0.57 (-16%), while Caterpillar trades at $882 versus $308 (-65%).
Yongmao Holdings
BKX.SG · SGD · Industrials
-16%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceS$0.68
Fair ValueS$0.57
Quality43/100
Caterpillar
CAT · USD · Industrials
-65%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$882
Fair Value$308
Quality64/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Yongmao HoldingsCaterpillar
Valuation
22.7×P/E (TTM)44.2×
0.08×P/S (TTM)6.11×
0.07×P/B20.27×
EV/EBITDA31.1×
PEG2.25×
7.5%Dividend yield0.6%
S$0.05Dividend per share$6.04
Profitability
2%Net margin13%
7%Operating margin18%
1%Return on equity51%
1%Return on assets9%
Growth
-5%Revenue growth (YoY)22%
-5.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)4.4%
-5.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.1%
Balance & size
0.09×Debt / equity1.44×
$50MMarket cap$432B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Caterpillar leads: 5 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Yongmao Holdingsof which business quality 39 · market factors 57 Caterpillarof which business quality 62 · market factors 62
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
19
61
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
43
22
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
3
68
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
35
51
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
94
72
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
83
32
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
41
68
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
53
86
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Yongmao Holdings

DCF ModelsS$12.27
Earnings-BasedS$2.25
MultiplesS$4.04
Asset-BasedS$7.09
Economic ProfitS$4.28
Growth EarningsS$2.31

0 of 13 models see the stock below the current price.

Caterpillar

DCF Models$365
Earnings-Based$151
Dividend Discount$111
Multiples$314
Asset-Based$31.01
Growth DCF$326
Economic Profit$220
Growth Earnings$361

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Yongmao Holdings
Bear S$0.47Fair Value S$0.57Bull S$0.72
S$0.68 = current price (white tick)
Caterpillar
Bear $192Fair Value $308Bull $403
$882 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Yongmao Holdings · Industrials

Quality score43 · below median
Fair value upside-16% · above median

Caterpillar · Industrials

Quality score64 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-65% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Yongmao Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: Yongmao Holdings trades at S$0.68 versus a fair value of S$0.57 (-16%), while Caterpillar trades at $882 versus $308 (-65%).

Caterpillar has the higher quality score (64/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.