EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Burnham Holdings vs Trane Technologies: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Burnham Holdings (BURCA) and Trane Technologies (TT) compare, as of Sep 6, 2026.

As of Sep 6, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Burnham Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: Burnham Holdings trades at $23.10 versus a fair value of $17.28 (-25%), while Trane Technologies trades at $448 versus $209 (-53%).
Burnham Holdings
BURCA · USD · Industrials
-25%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$23.10
Fair Value$17.28
Quality48/100
Trane Technologies
TT · USD · Industrials
-53%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$448
Fair Value$209
Quality74/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Burnham HoldingsTrane Technologies
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)34.6×
0.44×P/S (TTM)4.81×
1.13×P/B12.08×
—EV/EBITDA25.1×
—PEG2.00×
−25.2%Fair value upside−53.4%
4.0%Dividend yield0.9%
$0.92Dividend per share$3.87
Profitability
7%Operating margin16%
0.95×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.51×
-26%Return on equity37%
-2%Return on assets11%
Growth
2%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
2.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.1%
6.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)11.4%
—Value creation/yr+18.6%
Balance & size
16.6×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)17.4×
0.11×Debt / equity0.46×
$117MMarket cap$104B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Trane Technologies leads: 5 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Burnham Holdingsof which business quality 47 · market factors 44 Trane Technologiesof which business quality 71 · market factors 52
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
32
76
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
35
52
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
7
61
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
66
71
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
91
70
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
77
58
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
33
48
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
27
54
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
79
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyBurnham HoldingsPrice $23.10Trane TechnologiesPrice $448
DCF Modelsn/a-52%below the price$213
Earnings-Based-33%below the price$15.44-75%below the price$112
Dividend Discount-64%below the price$8.22-86%below the price$63.35
Multiples+63%above the price$37.55-51%below the price$219
Asset-Based-36%below the price$14.82-94%below the price$26.07
Growth DCFn/a-58%below the price$189
Economic Profit-33%below the price$15.44-66%below the price$153
Growth Earningsn/a-48%below the price$235
Minimum-64%below the price$8.22-94%below the price$26.07
Maximum+63%above the price$37.55-48%below the price$235
Median-33%below the price$15.44-62%below the price$171
Geometric mean-30%below the price$16.12-72%below the price$125

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Burnham Holdings: 5 of 8 models see the stock below the current price.

Trane Technologies: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Burnham Holdings
Bear $15.15Fair Value $17.28Bull $19.05
$23.10 = current price (white tick)
Trane Technologies
Bear $134Fair Value $209Bull $306
$448 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Burnham Holdings · Industrials

Quality score48 · below median
Fair value upside-25% · below median

Trane Technologies · Industrials

Quality score74 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-53% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 6, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Burnham Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: Burnham Holdings trades at $23.10 versus a fair value of $17.28 (-25%), while Trane Technologies trades at $448 versus $209 (-53%).

Trane Technologies has the higher quality score (74/100).

See the full analysis →
Burnham Holdings · Trane Technologies

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Burnham Holdings

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs PDD Holdings

Related to Trane Technologies

Amazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&tMeta Platforms vs NetEase
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.