EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

ConocoPhillips vs QEM: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how ConocoPhillips (COP) and QEM (QEM) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees QEM as the less overvalued of the two: ConocoPhillips trades at $129 versus a fair value of $90.15 (-30%), while QEM trades at A$0.02 versus A$0.01 (-19%).
ConocoPhillips
COP · USD · Energy
-30%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$129
Fair Value$90.15
Quality58/100
QEM
QEM.AU · AUD · Energy
-19%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceA$0.02
Fair ValueA$0.01
Quality34/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

ConocoPhillipsQEM
Valuation
21.7×P/E (TTM)n/a
21.0×P/E ex one-offs (FY2025)n/a
2.73×P/S (TTM)n/a
2.51×P/B1.71×
7.6×EV/EBITDAn/a
0.94×PEGn/a
−30.3%Fair value upside−18.7%
2.5%Dividend yieldn/a
$3.24Dividend per sharen/a
Profitability
22%Operating marginn/a
11%Return on equity-160%
6%Return on assets-76%
Growth
-5%Revenue growth (YoY)-30%
-9.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.8%
25.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-2.0%
+3.7%Value creation/yrn/a
Balance & size
9.3×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)n/a
0.34×Debt / equityn/a
$162BMarket cap$5M
weakGrowth qualityweak
The P/E excluding one-off items is only shown where the special items are documented in the accounts (our own raw data or SEC filings). If one side lacks it, the reported P/E stays scored.

QEM leads: 2 to 3 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

ConocoPhillipsof which business quality 61 · market factors 75 QEMof which business quality 34 · market factors 13
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
42
3
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
31
77
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
96
9
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
69
75
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
62
53
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
82
24
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
67
11
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
80
3
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
54
0

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyConocoPhillipsPrice $129QEMPrice A$0.02
DCF Models+8%close to the price$140n/a
Earnings-Based-67%below the price$42.34n/a
Dividend Discount-57%below the price$54.97n/a
Multiples-33%below the price$86.74n/a
Asset-Based-73%below the price$35.46-33%below the priceA$0.01
Growth DCF+23%above the price$159n/a
Economic Profit-58%below the price$54.19n/a
Growth Earnings-37%below the price$81.65n/a
Minimum-73%below the price$35.46-33%below the priceA$0.01
Maximum+23%above the price$159-33%below the priceA$0.01
Median-47%below the price$68.31-33%below the priceA$0.01
Geometric mean-44%below the price$71.81-33%below the priceA$0.01

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

ConocoPhillips: 20 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

QEM: 1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

ConocoPhillips
Price $129
Fair Value $90.15
Bear $67.61Bull $131

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

ConocoPhillips · Energy

Quality score58 · above median
Fair value upside-30% · below median

QEM · Energy

Quality score34 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-19% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees QEM as the less overvalued of the two: ConocoPhillips trades at $129 versus a fair value of $90.15 (-30%), while QEM trades at A$0.02 versus A$0.01 (-19%).

ConocoPhillips has the higher quality score (58/100).

Open QEM live analysis →
ConocoPhillips · QEM

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to ConocoPhillips

Microsoft vs NvidiaApple vs MicrosoftNvidia vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing

Related to QEM

Microsoft vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingBroadcom vs MicrosoftMicrosoft vs Micron TechnologyAdvanced Micro Devices vs Microsoft
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.