Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Creepy Jar (CRJ) and NetEase (NTES) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: Creepy Jar trades at PLN 554 versus a fair value of PLN 353 (-36%), while NetEase trades at $132 versus $171 (+29%).
Creepy Jar
CRJ.WAR · PLN · Communication Services
-36%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PricePLN 554
Fair ValuePLN 353
Quality65/100
NetEase
NTES · USD · Communication Services
+29%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$132
Fair Value$171
Quality81/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Creepy JarNetEase
Valuation
8.2×P/E (TTM)16.1×
1.46×P/S (TTM)4.75×
0.76×P/B3.39×
1.5×EV/EBITDA12.2×
—PEG1.33×
—Dividend yield2.4%
—Dividend per share$4.18
Profitability
68%Net margin30%
81%Operating margin41%
33%Return on equity22%
8%Return on assets11%
Growth
368%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
-18.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.3%
-4.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.9%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.00×
$90MMarket cap$81B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy
Creepy Jar leads: 8 to 3 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Creepy Jarof which business quality 62 · market factors 43NetEaseof which business quality 79 · market factors 53
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
58
71
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
48
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
47
63
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
57
69
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
33
47
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
44
45
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
87
89
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Creepy Jar
DCF ModelsPLN 265
Earnings-BasedPLN 861
Dividend DiscountPLN 152
MultiplesPLN 357
Asset-BasedPLN 114
Growth DCFPLN 128
Economic ProfitPLN 230
Growth EarningsPLN 1,142
20 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
NetEase
DCF Models$1,933
Earnings-Based$1,295
Dividend Discount$369
Multiples$834
Asset-Based$168
Growth DCF$1,771
Economic Profit$689
Growth Earnings$1,701
0 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Creepy Jar
Bear PLN 163Fair Value PLN 353Bull PLN 485
PLN 554 = current price (white tick)
NetEase
Bear $128Fair Value $171Bull $295
$132 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Creepy Jar · Communication Services
Quality score65 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-36% · below median
NetEase · Communication Services
Quality score81 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+29% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: Creepy Jar trades at PLN 554 versus a fair value of PLN 353 (-36%), while NetEase trades at $132 versus $171 (+29%).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
