EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Caesarstone vs Trane Technologies: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Caesarstone (CSTE) and Trane Technologies (TT) compare, as of Aug 17, 2026.

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Caesarstone as the less overvalued of the two: Caesarstone trades at $3.44 versus a fair value of $2.81 (-18%), while Trane Technologies trades at $480 versus $209 (-57%).
Caesarstone
CSTE · USD · Industrials
-18%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$3.44
Fair Value$2.81
Quality40/100
Trane Technologies
TT · USD · Industrials
-57%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$480
Fair Value$209
Quality74/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

CaesarstoneTrane Technologies
Valuation
P/E (TTM)37.1×
0.31×P/S (TTM)4.81×
0.82×P/B12.08×
EV/EBITDA25.1×
1.03×PEG2.00×
Dividend yield0.8%
Dividend per share$3.87
Profitability
-37%Net margin13%
-3%Operating margin16%
-81%Return on equity37%
-6%Return on assets11%
Growth
-5%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
-16.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.1%
-4.0%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)11.4%
Balance & size
0.00×Debt / equity0.46×
$119MMarket cap$104B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Trane Technologies leads: 4 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Caesarstoneof which business quality 40 · market factors 85 Trane Technologiesof which business quality 71 · market factors 55
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
21
76
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
23
52
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
61
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
51
71
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
70
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
59
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
100
46
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
100
65
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
81
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Caesarstone

Asset-Based$2.81

1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

Trane Technologies

DCF Models$213
Earnings-Based$112
Dividend Discount$63.35
Multiples$219
Asset-Based$26.07
Growth DCF$189
Economic Profit$153
Growth Earnings$235

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Caesarstone
Bear $2.09Fair Value $2.81Bull $4.19
$3.44 = current price (white tick)
Trane Technologies
Bear $134Fair Value $209Bull $306
$480 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Caesarstone · Industrials

Quality score40 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-18% · above median

Trane Technologies · Industrials

Quality score74 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-57% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Caesarstone as the less overvalued of the two: Caesarstone trades at $3.44 versus a fair value of $2.81 (-18%), while Trane Technologies trades at $480 versus $209 (-57%).

Trane Technologies has the higher quality score (74/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.