STOCK COMPARISON
Curtiss-Wright vs GE Aerospace: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Curtiss-Wright (CW) and GE Aerospace (GE) compare, as of Aug 8, 2026.
As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Curtiss-Wright as the less overvalued of the two: Curtiss-Wright trades at $714 versus a fair value of $243 (-66%), while GE Aerospace trades at $375 versus $117 (-69%).
Curtiss-Wright
CW · USD · Industrials
-66%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$714
Fair Value$243
Quality71/100
GE Aerospace
GE · USD · Industrials
-69%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$375
Fair Value$117
Quality73/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Curtiss-WrightGE Aerospace
Valuation
51.8×P/E (TTM)43.8×
7.25×P/S (TTM)7.65×
10.32×P/B19.79×
32.2×EV/EBITDA34.1×
2.00×PEG8.51×
0.1%Dividend yield0.4%
$0.96Dividend per share$1.55
Profitability
14%Net margin18%
18%Operating margin20%
20%Return on equity45%
9%Return on assets5%
Growth
13%Revenue growth (YoY)25%
11.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-15.7%
7.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-9.6%
Balance & size
0.30×Debt / equity1.01×
$26BMarket cap$370B
healthyGrowth qualityweak
Curtiss-Wright leads: 8 to 6 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Curtiss-Wrightof which business quality 69 · market factors 67
GE Aerospaceof which business quality 67 · market factors 71
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
56
54
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
52
64
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
69
63
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
74
49
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
76
99
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
63
48
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
64
79
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
78
86
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
96
96
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Curtiss-Wright
DCF Models$268
Earnings-Based$124
Dividend Discount$16.54
Multiples$240
Asset-Based$45.95
Growth DCF$264
Economic Profit$148
Growth Earnings$199
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
GE Aerospace
DCF Models$104
Earnings-Based$73.12
Dividend Discount$15.91
Multiples$114
Asset-Based$11.99
Growth DCF$99.14
Economic Profit$108
Growth Earnings$126
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Curtiss-Wright
Bear $171Fair Value $243Bull $310
$714 = current price (white tick)
GE Aerospace
Bear $70.76Fair Value $117Bull $148
$375 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Curtiss-Wright · Industrials
Quality score71 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-66% · bottom 25%
GE Aerospace · Industrials
Quality score73 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-69% · bottom 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Curtiss-Wright as the less overvalued of the two: Curtiss-Wright trades at $714 versus a fair value of $243 (-66%), while GE Aerospace trades at $375 versus $117 (-69%).
GE Aerospace has the higher quality score (73/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
