EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Cyanconnode Holdings vs Cisco Systems: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Cyanconnode Holdings (CYAN) and Cisco Systems (CSCO) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cisco Systems as the less overvalued of the two: Cyanconnode Holdings trades at £0.08 versus a fair value of £0.02 (-79%), while Cisco Systems trades at $121 versus $56.19 (-54%).
Cyanconnode Holdings
CYAN.LSE · GBP · Information Technology
-79%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price£0.08
Fair Value£0.02
Quality26/100
Cisco Systems
CSCO · USD · Information Technology
-54%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$121
Fair Value$56.19
Quality74/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Cyanconnode HoldingsCisco Systems
Valuation
P/E (TTM)40.4×
2.39×P/S (TTM)7.87×
2.53×P/B10.21×
EV/EBITDA29.0×
PEG1.68×
Dividend yield1.4%
Dividend per share$1.65
Profitability
-30%Net margin20%
-40%Operating margin25%
-34%Return on equity25%
-8%Return on assets7%
Growth
32%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
14.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)3.2%
Avg. growth/yr (5Y)2.8%
Balance & size
Debt / equity0.49×
$38MMarket cap$478B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

Even match: 4 to 4 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Cyanconnode Holdingsof which business quality 26 · market factors 62 Cisco Systemsof which business quality 70 · market factors 84
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
10
58
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
44
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
21
85
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
44
64
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
41
75
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
51
61
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
58
95
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
81
94
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
97

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Cyanconnode Holdings

Asset-Based£0.03

1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

Cisco Systems

DCF Models$56.75
Earnings-Based$25.45
Dividend Discount$31.20
Multiples$40.16
Asset-Based$7.96
Growth DCF$56.88
Economic Profit$28.50
Growth Earnings$40.89

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Cisco Systems
Bear $40.50Fair Value $56.19Bull $71.87
$121 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Cyanconnode Holdings · Information Technology

Quality score26 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-79% · bottom 25%

Cisco Systems · Information Technology

Quality score74 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-54% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cisco Systems as the less overvalued of the two: Cyanconnode Holdings trades at £0.08 versus a fair value of £0.02 (-79%), while Cisco Systems trades at $121 versus $56.19 (-54%).

Cisco Systems has the higher quality score (74/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.