EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

EMS vs Quanta Services: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how EMS (EMSLIMITED) and Quanta Services (PWR) compare, as of Sep 27, 2026.

As of Sep 27, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees EMS as the less overvalued of the two: EMS trades at ₹355 versus a fair value of ₹277 (−21.9%), while Quanta Services trades at $649 versus $163 (−74.9%).
EMS
EMSLIMITED.NSE · INR · Utilities
−21.9%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹355
Fair Value₹277
Quality37/100
Quanta Services
PWR · USD · Industrials
−74.9%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$649
Fair Value$163
Quality50/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

EMSQuanta Services
Valuation
21.8×P/E (TTM)73.1×
n/aForward P/E (FY2026)38.8×
n/aMedian P/E at FY-end (10 FY, ex one-offs where documented)30.6×
3.16×P/S (TTM)3.01×
2.20×P/B11.07× · book value is mostly goodwill
16.8×EV/EBITDA34.1×
n/aPEG1.45×
−21.9%Fair value upside−74.9%
0.4%Dividend yield0.1%
₹1.50Dividend per share$0.43
Profitability
13.1%Operating margin7.2%
0.60×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.02×
9.0%Return on equity15.3%
6.5%Return on assets5.2%
Growth
-57.1%Revenue growth (YoY)41.1%
10.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)18.4%
17.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)20.4%
+3.2%Value creation/yr+16.8%
Balance & size
9.8×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)6.3×
0.10×Debt / equity0.59×
$242MMarket cap$99B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy
Quanta Services, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 10 fiscal years (2016 to 2025), reported earnings, 5 of the years ex one-offs: 30.6.
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

EMS leads: 6 to 5 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

EMSof which business quality 39 · market factors 37 Quanta Servicesof which business quality 53 · market factors 63
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
41
45
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
3
44
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
59
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
82
55
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
19
36
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
57
41
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
36
67
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
16
82
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
82
75

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyEMSPrice ₹355Quanta ServicesPrice $649
DCF Models−68.0%below the price₹114−63.4%below the price$238
Earnings-Based−25.8%below the price₹263−82.9%below the price$111
Dividend Discount−95.2%below the price₹17.05−98.9%below the price$7.07
Multiples−19.6%below the price₹285−80.0%below the price$130
Asset-Based−64.1%below the price₹127−93.9%below the price$39.83
Growth DCFn/a−61.5%below the price$250
Economic Profit−61.6%below the price₹136−90.0%below the price$64.70
Growth Earnings+1.7%close to the price₹361−74.9%below the price$163
Minimum−95.2%below the price₹17.05−98.9%below the price$7.07
Maximum+1.7%close to the price₹361−61.5%below the price$250
Median−61.6%below the price₹136−81.4%below the price$121
Geometric mean−61.4%below the price₹137−87.0%below the price$84.27

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

EMS: 15 of 17 models see the stock below the current price.

Quanta Services: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

EMS
Price ₹355
Fair Value ₹277
Bear ₹208Bull ₹346
Quanta Services
Price $649
Fair Value $163
Bear $108Bull $212

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

EMS · Utilities

Quality score37 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside−21.9% · below median

Quanta Services · Industrials

Quality score50 · below median
Fair value upside−74.9% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 27, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees EMS as the less overvalued of the two: EMS trades at ₹355 versus a fair value of ₹277 (−21.9%), while Quanta Services trades at $649 versus $163 (−74.9%).

Quanta Services has the higher quality score (50/100).

Open EMS live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.