EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Faze Three vs Shenzhou International Group Holdings: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Faze Three (FAZE3Q) and Shenzhou International Group Holdings (2313) compare, as of Aug 13, 2026.

As of Aug 13, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shenzhou International Group Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Faze Three trades at ₹543 versus a fair value of ₹276 (-49%), while Shenzhou International Group Holdings trades at HK$42.10 versus HK$75.65 (+80%).
Faze Three
FAZE3Q.NSE · INR · Consumer Discretionary
-49%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹543
Fair Value₹276
Quality46/100
Shenzhou International Group Holdings
2313.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
+80%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$42.10
Fair ValueHK$75.65
Quality62/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Faze ThreeShenzhou International Group Holdings
Valuation
45.3×P/E (TTM)9.9×
1.64×P/S (TTM)2.15×
3.35×P/B1.78×
18.7×EV/EBITDA7.2×
PEG0.88×
Dividend yield5.2%
Dividend per shareHK$2.34
Profitability
4%Net margin19%
9%Operating margin18%
8%Return on equity16%
4%Return on assets7%
Growth
32%Revenue growth (YoY)2%
20.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)3.7%
24.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)6.1%
Balance & size
0.09×Debt / equity0.01×
$159MMarket cap$9B
expensiveGrowth qualitymixed

Shenzhou International Group Holdings leads: 4 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Faze Threeof which business quality 47 · market factors 53 Shenzhou International Group Holdingsof which business quality 61 · market factors 27
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
49
53
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
48
33
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
18
42
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
55
94
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
38
60
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
57
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
56
18
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
51
9
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
81
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Faze Three

Earnings-Based₹189
Dividend Discount₹8.78
Multiples₹285
Asset-Based₹125
Economic Profit₹175
Growth Earnings₹291

16 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Shenzhou International Group Holdings

DCF ModelsHK$70.68
Earnings-BasedHK$45.41
Dividend DiscountHK$43.01
MultiplesHK$67.20
Asset-BasedHK$16.72
Growth DCFHK$46.79
Economic ProfitHK$44.98
Growth EarningsHK$73.43

5 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Faze Three
Bear ₹180Fair Value ₹276Bull ₹372
₹543 = current price (white tick)
Shenzhou International Group Holdings
Bear HK$46.78Fair Value HK$75.65Bull HK$95.17
HK$42.10 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Faze Three · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score46 · below median
Fair value upside-49% · bottom 25%

Shenzhou International Group Holdings · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score62 · above median
Fair value upside+80% · Top 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 13, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shenzhou International Group Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Faze Three trades at ₹543 versus a fair value of ₹276 (-49%), while Shenzhou International Group Holdings trades at HK$42.10 versus HK$75.65 (+80%).

Shenzhou International Group Holdings has the higher quality score (62/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.