EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Ganesha Ecosphere vs Shenzhou International Group Holdings: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Ganesha Ecosphere (GANECOS) and Shenzhou International Group Holdings (2313) compare, as of Aug 17, 2026.

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shenzhou International Group Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Ganesha Ecosphere trades at ₹1,061 versus a fair value of ₹313 (-70%), while Shenzhou International Group Holdings trades at HK$41.48 versus HK$68.24 (+65%).
Ganesha Ecosphere
GANECOS.NSE · INR · Consumer Discretionary
-70%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹1,061
Fair Value₹313
Quality30/100
Shenzhou International Group Holdings
2313.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
+65%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$41.48
Fair ValueHK$68.24
Quality62/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Ganesha EcosphereShenzhou International Group Holdings
Valuation
73.1×P/E (TTM)9.9×
1.66×P/S (TTM)2.15×
1.93×P/B1.78×
18.9×EV/EBITDA7.2×
PEG0.88×
0.4%Dividend yield5.2%
₹3.50Dividend per shareHK$2.34
Profitability
3%Net margin19%
8%Operating margin18%
3%Return on equity16%
2%Return on assets7%
Growth
23%Revenue growth (YoY)2%
7.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)3.7%
14.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)6.1%
Balance & size
0.27×Debt / equity0.01×
$258MMarket cap$9B
expensiveGrowth qualitymixed

Shenzhou International Group Holdings leads: 4 to 9 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Ganesha Ecosphereof which business quality 35 · market factors 48 Shenzhou International Group Holdingsof which business quality 61 · market factors 27
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
29
53
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
16
33
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
38
42
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
62
94
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
24
60
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
63
57
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
49
18
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
27
9
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
26
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Ganesha Ecosphere

Earnings-Based₹186
Dividend Discount₹52.80
Multiples₹303
Asset-Based₹319
Economic Profit₹253
Growth Earnings₹292

16 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Shenzhou International Group Holdings

DCF ModelsHK$70.68
Earnings-BasedHK$45.41
Dividend DiscountHK$43.01
MultiplesHK$67.20
Asset-BasedHK$16.72
Growth DCFHK$46.79
Economic ProfitHK$44.98
Growth EarningsHK$73.43

5 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Ganesha Ecosphere
Bear ₹236Fair Value ₹313Bull ₹380
₹1,061 = current price (white tick)
Shenzhou International Group Holdings
Bear HK$45.16Fair Value HK$68.24Bull HK$85.21
HK$41.48 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Ganesha Ecosphere · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score30 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-70% · bottom 25%

Shenzhou International Group Holdings · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score62 · above median
Fair value upside+65% · Top 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shenzhou International Group Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Ganesha Ecosphere trades at ₹1,061 versus a fair value of ₹313 (-70%), while Shenzhou International Group Holdings trades at HK$41.48 versus HK$68.24 (+65%).

Shenzhou International Group Holdings has the higher quality score (62/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.