EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Grupo Carso S.A.B. de C.V vs Citic Pacific: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Grupo Carso S.A.B. de C.V (GCARSOA1) and Citic Pacific (0267) compare, as of Aug 8, 2026.

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Citic Pacific as the more attractively valued of the two: Grupo Carso S.A.B. de C.V trades at MXN 127 versus a fair value of MXN 66.21 (-48%), while Citic Pacific trades at HK$11.94 versus HK$22.56 (+89%).
Grupo Carso S.A.B. de C.V
GCARSOA1.MX · MXN · Industrials
-48%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceMXN 127
Fair ValueMXN 66.21
Quality56/100
Citic Pacific
0267.HK · HKD · Industrials
+89%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$11.94
Fair ValueHK$22.56
Quality47/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Grupo Carso S.A.B. de C.VCitic Pacific
Valuation
32.7×P/E (TTM)4.8×
1.49×P/S (TTM)0.34×
1.97×P/B0.37×
11.9×EV/EBITDA2.8×
—PEG1.76×
—Dividend yield5.2%
—Dividend per shareHK$0.59
Profitability
4%Net margin6%
7%Operating margin30%
7%Return on equity8%
4%Return on assets1%
Growth
-1%Revenue growth (YoY)-2%
1.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.2%
16.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.9%
Balance & size
0.15×Debt / equity2.03×
$17BMarket cap$41B
mixedGrowth qualityexpensive

Citic Pacific leads: 4 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Grupo Carso S.A.B. de C.Vof which business quality 59 · market factors 48 Citic Pacificof which business quality 39 · market factors 50
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
35
20
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
46
54
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
62
23
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
64
20
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
79
69
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
76
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
40
37
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
31
46
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Grupo Carso S.A.B. de C.V

DCF ModelsMXN 118
Earnings-BasedMXN 47.32
Dividend DiscountMXN 41.04
MultiplesMXN 94.21
Asset-BasedMXN 43.11
Growth DCFMXN 124
Economic ProfitMXN 71.37
Growth EarningsMXN 66.75

20 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Citic Pacific

DCF ModelsHK$43.54
Earnings-BasedHK$38.05
Dividend DiscountHK$11.60
MultiplesHK$44.73
Asset-BasedHK$20.07
Economic ProfitHK$26.67
Growth EarningsHK$53.29

1 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Grupo Carso S.A.B. de C.V
Bear MXN 49.66Fair Value MXN 66.21Bull MXN 82.76
MXN 127 = current price (white tick)
Citic Pacific
Bear HK$16.92Fair Value HK$22.56Bull HK$28.20
HK$11.94 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Grupo Carso S.A.B. de C.V · Industrials

Quality score56 · above median
Fair value upside-48% · below median

Citic Pacific · Industrials

Quality score47 · below median
Fair value upside+89% · Top 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Citic Pacific as the more attractively valued of the two: Grupo Carso S.A.B. de C.V trades at MXN 127 versus a fair value of MXN 66.21 (-48%), while Citic Pacific trades at HK$11.94 versus HK$22.56 (+89%).

Grupo Carso S.A.B. de C.V has the higher quality score (56/100).

See the full analysis →
Grupo Carso S.A.B. de C.V · Citic Pacific

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Grupo Carso S.A.B. de C.V

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to Citic Pacific

Amazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&t
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.