EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Goldman Sachs Group vs Royal Bank of Canada: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Goldman Sachs Group (GS) and Royal Bank of Canada (RY) compare, as of Sep 6, 2026.

As of Sep 6, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Goldman Sachs Group as the less overvalued of the two: Goldman Sachs Group trades at $1,039 versus a fair value of $757 (-27%), while Royal Bank of Canada trades at $211 versus $152 (-28%).
Goldman Sachs Group
GS · USD · Financials
-27%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$1,039
Fair Value$757
Quality53/100
Royal Bank of Canada
RY · USD · Financials
-28%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$211
Fair Value$152
Quality63/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Goldman Sachs GroupRoyal Bank of Canada
Valuation
17.6×P/E (TTM)19.5×
5.03×P/S (TTM)4.46×
2.72×P/B2.11×
19.6×EV/EBITDA19.5×
1.57×PEG2.34×
−27.1%Fair value upside−27.9%
1.5%Dividend yield3.0%
$15.50Dividend per share$6.36
Profitability
42%Operating margin45%
0.75×EBIT margin trend (5Y)0.80×
17%Return on equity16%
1%Return on assets1%
Growth
43%Revenue growth (YoY)16%
22.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)27.1%
18.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)17.6%
+17.1%Value creation/yr+13.1%
Balance & size
0.3×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)0.4×
2.37×Debt / equity2.54×
$340BMarket cap$293B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Royal Bank of Canada leads: 6 to 9 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Goldman Sachs Groupof which business quality 43 · market factors 65 Royal Bank of Canadaof which business quality 57 · market factors 81
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
29
30
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
58
62
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
100
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
30
13
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
83
74
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
51
83
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
66
74
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
77
93
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
100
83

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyGoldman Sachs GroupPrice $1,039Royal Bank of CanadaPrice $211
DCF Models-35%below the price$680n/a
Earnings-Based-21%below the price$818n/a
Dividend Discount-68%below the price$334-43%below the price$121
Multiples-35%below the price$675-22%below the price$165
Asset-Based-73%below the price$284-68%below the price$67.06
Economic Profit-49%below the price$534-38%below the price$131
Minimum-73%below the price$284-68%below the price$67.06
Maximum-21%below the price$818-22%below the price$165
Median-42%below the price$604-40%below the price$126
Geometric mean-50%below the price$517-45%below the price$115

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Goldman Sachs Group: 8 of 9 models see the stock below the current price.

Royal Bank of Canada: 6 of 6 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Goldman Sachs Group
Bear $406Fair Value $757Bull $946
$1,039 = current price (white tick)
Royal Bank of Canada
Bear $114Fair Value $152Bull $190
$211 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Goldman Sachs Group · Financials

Quality score53 · below median
Fair value upside-27% · below median

Royal Bank of Canada · Financials

Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-28% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 6, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Goldman Sachs Group as the less overvalued of the two: Goldman Sachs Group trades at $1,039 versus a fair value of $757 (-27%), while Royal Bank of Canada trades at $211 versus $152 (-28%).

Royal Bank of Canada has the higher quality score (63/100).

See the full analysis →
Goldman Sachs Group · Royal Bank of Canada

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Goldman Sachs Group

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs PDD Holdings

Related to Royal Bank of Canada

Amazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&tMeta Platforms vs NetEase
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.