EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Gyldendal A/S vs New York Times: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Gyldendal A/S (GYLD-B) and New York Times (NYT) compare, as of Sep 5, 2026.

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees New York Times as the less overvalued of the two: Gyldendal A/S trades at DKK 368 versus a fair value of DKK 177 (-52%), while New York Times trades at $67.28 versus $41.95 (-38%).
Gyldendal A/S
GYLD-B.CO · DKK · Communication Services
-52%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceDKK 368
Fair ValueDKK 177
Quality72/100
New York Times
NYT · USD · Communication Services
-38%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$67.28
Fair Value$41.95
Quality79/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Gyldendal A/SNew York Times
Valuation
10.1×P/E (TTM)28.7×
0.37×P/S (TTM)4.24×
0.73×P/B5.96×
3.9×EV/EBITDA22.3×
—PEG3.79×
−51.9%Fair value upside−37.6%
5.4%Dividend yield1.1%
DKK 20.00Dividend per share$0.77
Profitability
12%Operating margin13%
1.83×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.62×
10%Return on equity20%
6%Return on assets10%
Growth
14%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
4.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)7.0%
-2.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.6%
+25.7%Value creation/yr+24.1%
Balance & size
89.0×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)386.2×
0.09×Debt / equity—
$293MMarket cap$12B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Even match: 7 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Gyldendal A/Sof which business quality 72 · market factors 50 New York Timesof which business quality 77 · market factors 47
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
59
69
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
55
60
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
76
83
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
81
85
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
87
76
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
78
67
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
37
33
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
40
48
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
87

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyGyldendal A/SPrice DKK 368New York TimesPrice $67.28
DCF Models-50%below the priceDKK 183-36%below the price$43.20
Earnings-Based-79%below the priceDKK 77.27-63%below the price$25.06
Dividend Discount-91%below the priceDKK 34.76-88%below the price$8.21
Multiples-55%below the priceDKK 166-40%below the price$40.11
Asset-Based-86%below the priceDKK 52.64-87%below the price$8.49
Growth DCF-51%below the priceDKK 180-33%below the price$45.30
Economic Profit-78%below the priceDKK 80.46-67%below the price$22.32
Growth Earnings-64%below the priceDKK 132-47%below the price$35.48
Minimum-91%below the priceDKK 34.76-88%below the price$8.21
Maximum-50%below the priceDKK 183-33%below the price$45.30
Median-71%below the priceDKK 106-55%below the price$30.27
Geometric mean-73%below the priceDKK 97.52-64%below the price$23.96

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Gyldendal A/S: 24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

New York Times: 24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Gyldendal A/S
Bear DKK 133Fair Value DKK 177Bull DKK 221
DKK 368 = current price (white tick)
New York Times
Bear $31.78Fair Value $41.95Bull $52.11
$67.28 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Gyldendal A/S · Communication Services

Quality score72 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-52% · below median

New York Times · Communication Services

Quality score79 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-38% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees New York Times as the less overvalued of the two: Gyldendal A/S trades at DKK 368 versus a fair value of DKK 177 (-52%), while New York Times trades at $67.28 versus $41.95 (-38%).

New York Times has the higher quality score (79/100).

See the full analysis →
Gyldendal A/S · New York Times

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Gyldendal A/S

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseMeta Platforms vs Verizon Communications

Related to New York Times

Meta Platforms vs At&tMeta Platforms vs NetEaseNetflix vs Verizon CommunicationsNetflix vs At&t
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.