STOCK COMPARISON
Lafargeholcim Ltd vs Crh Plc: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Lafargeholcim Ltd (HCMLY) and Crh Plc (CRH) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Crh Plc as the less overvalued of the two: Lafargeholcim Ltd trades at $17.49 versus a fair value of $9.03 (-48%), while Crh Plc trades at $100 versus $70.57 (-30%).
Lafargeholcim Ltd
HCMLY · USD · Materials
-48%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$17.49
Fair Value$9.03
Quality62/100
Crh Plc
CRH · USD · Materials
-30%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$100
Fair Value$70.57
Quality61/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Lafargeholcim LtdCrh Plc
Valuation
106.7×P/E (TTM)19.1×
—P/S (TTM)1.81×
—P/B2.86×
—EV/EBITDA10.7×
0.45×PEG2.05×
2.2%Dividend yield1.5%
$1.70Dividend per share$1.50
Profitability
84%Net margin10%
12%Operating margin-0%
2%Return on equity16%
3%Return on assets6%
Growth
-4%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
-18.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)7.2%
-7.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.7%
Balance & size
0.48×Debt / equity0.69×
$53BMarket cap$69B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Crh Plc leads: 5 to 6 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Lafargeholcim Ltdof which business quality 59 · market factors 53
Crh Plcof which business quality 59 · market factors 38
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
31
48
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
21
43
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
65
49
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
63
60
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
92
63
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
75
54
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
40
32
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
52
30
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
99
99
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Lafargeholcim Ltd
DCF Models$7.05
Earnings-Based$4.43
Dividend Discount$6.39
Multiples$6.39
Asset-Based$3.73
Growth DCF$7.61
Economic Profit$5.51
Growth Earnings$3.77
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Crh Plc
DCF Models$71.97
Earnings-Based$47.77
Dividend Discount$26.07
Multiples$93.20
Asset-Based$24.07
Growth DCF$65.75
Economic Profit$55.66
Growth Earnings$89.49
25 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Lafargeholcim Ltd
Bear $8.07Fair Value $9.03Bull $11.28
$17.49 = current price (white tick)
Crh Plc
Bear $35.94Fair Value $70.57Bull $117
$100 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Lafargeholcim Ltd · Materials
Quality score62 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-48% · below median
Crh Plc · Materials
Quality score61 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-30% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Crh Plc as the less overvalued of the two: Lafargeholcim Ltd trades at $17.49 versus a fair value of $9.03 (-48%), while Crh Plc trades at $100 versus $70.57 (-30%).
Lafargeholcim Ltd has the higher quality score (62/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
