Hunter Group ASA vs Enbridge: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Hunter Group ASA (HUNT) and Enbridge (ENB) compare, as of Aug 14, 2026.
As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Enbridge as the less overvalued of the two: Hunter Group ASA trades at NOK 9.50 versus a fair value of NOK 6.28 (-34%), while Enbridge trades at $51.29 versus $35.83 (-30%).
Hunter Group ASA
HUNT.OL · NOK · Energy
-34%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceNOK 9.50
Fair ValueNOK 6.28
Quality72/100
Enbridge
ENB · USD · Energy
-30%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$51.29
Fair Value$35.83
Quality39/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Hunter Group ASAEnbridge
Valuation
1.6×P/E (TTM)24.5×
2.66×P/S (TTM)1.78×
5.50×P/B1.43×
2.7×EV/EBITDA12.9×
—PEG5.32×
1.2%Dividend yield6.8%
NOK 0.10Dividend per share$3.80
Profitability
159%Net margin10%
97%Operating margin15%
196%Return on equity10%
58%Return on assets3%
Growth
-87%Revenue growth (YoY)21%
-6.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)6.9%
-32.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.8%
Balance & size
0.00×Debt / equity1.15×
$114MMarket cap$123B
weakGrowth qualityexpensive
Hunter Group ASA leads: 7 to 6 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Hunter Group ASAof which business quality 71 · market factors 70Enbridgeof which business quality 39 · market factors 60
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
90
29
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
66
49
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
20
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
0
86
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
100
47
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
100
53
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
29
62
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Hunter Group ASA
DCF ModelsNOK 0.30
Earnings-BasedNOK 0.86
Dividend DiscountNOK 0.26
MultiplesNOK 0.46
Asset-BasedNOK 0.10
Growth DCFNOK 0.15
Economic ProfitNOK 1.07
Growth EarningsNOK 1.12
23 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.
Enbridge
DCF Models$11.43
Earnings-Based$47.20
Dividend Discount$95.43
Multiples$35.83
Asset-Based$26.24
Growth DCF$4.03
Economic Profit$18.87
Growth Earnings$58.48
19 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Hunter Group ASA
Bear NOK 4.85Fair Value NOK 6.28Bull NOK 7.70
NOK 9.50 = current price (white tick)
Enbridge
Bear $33.04Fair Value $35.83Bull $46.53
$51.29 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Hunter Group ASA · Energy
Quality score72 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-34% · below median
Enbridge · Energy
Quality score39 · below median
Fair value upside-30% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Enbridge as the less overvalued of the two: Hunter Group ASA trades at NOK 9.50 versus a fair value of NOK 6.28 (-34%), while Enbridge trades at $51.29 versus $35.83 (-30%).
Hunter Group ASA has the higher quality score (72/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
