Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Hunter Group (HUNT) Fair Value & Analysis

Energy · NO · Market cap 941M NOK

Pricekr 10.28
Fair Valuekr 6.51
Upside-36.7%
Quality95/100
Evidence: High Range kr 5.03 – kr 7.99

Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Hunter Group (HUNT) currently trades at kr 10.28, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is kr 6.51 — implying the stock looks roughly 36.7% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Energy sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

About the company

Hunter Group ASA provides oil tanker chartering services through VLCCs in Norway. It also focuses on shipping and oil service investments. The company was formerly known as Badger Explorer ASA and changed its name to Hunter Group ASA in May 2017. Hunter Group ASA was founded in 2003 and is headquartered in Oslo, Norway.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Enbridge Inc (ENB) -32% The Williams Companies, Inc (WMB) -84% Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) -33% TC Energy Corporation (TRP) -41% Kinder Morgan, Inc (KMI) -56% Energy Transfer LP, (ET) -8%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunter Group (HUNT) undervalued?
As of Jun 24, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of kr 6.51 versus a price of kr 10.28 — about −37% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of HUNT?
Our 21-model fair value for Hunter Group is kr 6.51 (as of Jun 24, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is kr 10.28.
What is the quality score of HUNT?
Hunter Group has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.