STOCK COMPARISON
IES Holdings vs LT: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how IES Holdings (IESC) and LT (LT) compare, as of Aug 8, 2026.
As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees LT as the less overvalued of the two: IES Holdings trades at $768 versus a fair value of $276 (-64%), while LT trades at ₹4,062 versus ₹1,994 (-51%).
IES Holdings
IESC · USD · Industrials
-64%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$768
Fair Value$276
Quality66/100
LT
LT.NSE · INR · Industrials
-51%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹4,062
Fair Value₹1,994
Quality51/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
IES HoldingsLT
Valuation
32.5×P/E (TTM)32.6×
3.36×P/S (TTM)1.80×
13.82×P/B4.80×
25.4×EV/EBITDA16.8×
—PEG1.06×
—Dividend yield1.0%
—Dividend per share₹38.00
Profitability
10%Net margin6%
12%Operating margin11%
42%Return on equity17%
16%Return on assets5%
Growth
17%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
15.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)15.4%
23.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)16.3%
Balance & size
0.09×Debt / equity0.58×
$12BMarket cap$55B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
IES Holdings leads: 9 to 3 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
IES Holdingsof which business quality 67 · market factors 66
LTof which business quality 43 · market factors 63
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
88
36
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
53
34
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
44
40
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
81
32
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
34
70
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
1
89
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
93
48
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
97
59
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
93
60
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
IES Holdings
DCF Models$305
Earnings-Based$179
Dividend Discount$0.02
Multiples$272
Asset-Based$29.73
Growth DCF$269
Economic Profit$209
Growth Earnings$280
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
LT
DCF Models₹2,632
Earnings-Based₹1,664
Dividend Discount₹649
Multiples₹2,178
Asset-Based₹532
Growth DCF₹2,304
Economic Profit₹1,397
Growth Earnings₹2,399
25 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
IES Holdings
Bear $154Fair Value $276Bull $350
$768 = current price (white tick)
LT
Bear ₹1,282Fair Value ₹1,994Bull ₹3,197
₹4,062 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
IES Holdings · Industrials
Quality score66 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-64% · bottom 25%
LT · Industrials
Quality score51 · above median
Fair value upside-51% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees LT as the less overvalued of the two: IES Holdings trades at $768 versus a fair value of $276 (-64%), while LT trades at ₹4,062 versus ₹1,994 (-51%).
IES Holdings has the higher quality score (66/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
