EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Iris Clothings vs H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ): Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Iris Clothings (IRISDOREME) and H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) (HM-B) compare, as of Aug 18, 2026.

As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: Iris Clothings trades at ₹58.30 versus a fair value of ₹15.75 (-73%), while H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) trades at SEK 173 versus SEK 165 (-4%).
Iris Clothings
IRISDOREME.NSE · INR · Consumer Discretionary
-73%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹58.30
Fair Value₹15.75
Quality33/100
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
HM-B.ST · SEK · Consumer Discretionary
-4%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
PriceSEK 173
Fair ValueSEK 165
Quality72/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Iris ClothingsH & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
Valuation
68.6×P/E (TTM)21.3×
3.83×P/S (TTM)1.19×
5.16×P/B6.10×
25.1×EV/EBITDA10.8×
PEG2.59×
Dividend yield4.3%
Dividend per shareSEK 7.10
Profitability
8%Net margin6%
16%Operating margin11%
14%Return on equity35%
8%Return on assets7%
Growth
50%Revenue growth (YoY)-3%
19.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.7%
16.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.1%
Balance & size
Debt / equity0.43×
$77MMarket cap$28B
expensiveGrowth qualitymixed

Iris Clothings leads: 7 to 4 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Iris Clothingsof which business quality 34 · market factors 91 H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)of which business quality 69 · market factors 60
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
51
76
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
42
37
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
65
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
67
58
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
21
96
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
75
70
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
96
49
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
100
70
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
14
89

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Iris Clothings

DCF Models₹7.57
Earnings-Based₹18.11
Multiples₹18.34
Asset-Based₹5.56
Economic Profit₹12.30
Growth Earnings₹25.66

15 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)

DCF ModelsSEK 255
Earnings-BasedSEK 84.94
MultiplesSEK 182
Asset-BasedSEK 20.51
Growth DCFSEK 244
Economic ProfitSEK 110
Growth EarningsSEK 162

10 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Iris Clothings
Bear ₹11.40Fair Value ₹15.75Bull ₹20.10
₹58.30 = current price (white tick)
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
Bear SEK 111Fair Value SEK 165Bull SEK 225
SEK 173 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Iris Clothings · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score33 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-73% · bottom 25%

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score72 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-4% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: Iris Clothings trades at ₹58.30 versus a fair value of ₹15.75 (-73%), while H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) trades at SEK 173 versus SEK 165 (-4%).

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) has the higher quality score (72/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.