EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Keysight Technologies vs Optiscan Imaging: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Keysight Technologies (KEYS) and Optiscan Imaging (OIL) compare, as of Oct 5, 2026.

As of Oct 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Keysight Technologies as the less overvalued of the two: Keysight Technologies trades at $385 versus a fair value of $116 (−69.8%), while Optiscan Imaging trades at A$0.17 versus A$0.02 (−90.0%).
Keysight Technologies
KEYS · USD · Information Technology
−69.8%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$385
Fair Value$116
Quality70/100
Optiscan Imaging
OIL.AU · AUD · Health Care
−90.0%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceA$0.17
Fair ValueA$0.02
Quality26/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Keysight TechnologiesOptiscan Imaging
Valuation
51.5×P/E (TTM)n/a
27.7×Forward P/E (FY2027)n/a
31.3×Median P/E at FY-end (10 FY, ex one-offs where documented)n/a
10.11×P/S (TTM)33.09×
11.32×P/B6.31×
39.6×EV/EBITDAn/a
0.70×PEG2.41×
−69.8%Fair value upside−90.0%
Profitability
25.7%Operating margin-182.7%
0.97×EBIT margin trend (5Y)n/a
20.9%Return on equity-52.4%
7.2%Return on assets-28.5%
Growth
36.5%Revenue growth (YoY)124.5%
-0.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-35.6%
5.0%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-12.8%
+8.9%Value creation/yrn/a
Balance & size
9.9×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)n/a
0.43×Debt / equity0.03×
$67BMarket cap$120M
healthyGrowth qualityweak
Keysight Technologies, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 10 fiscal years (2016 to 2025), reported earnings, 6 of the years ex one-offs: 31.3.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Keysight Technologies leads: 7 to 1 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Keysight Technologiesof which business quality 69 · market factors 75 Optiscan Imagingof which business quality 26 · market factors 82
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
52
0
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
47
20
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
89
12
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
76
100
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
59
0
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
41
50
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
84
100
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
100
89
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
87
0

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyKeysight TechnologiesPrice $385Optiscan ImagingPrice A$0.17
DCF Models−68.8%below the price$120n/a
Earnings-Based−90.4%below the price$36.83n/a
Multiples−74.7%below the price$97.34n/a
Asset-Based−94.0%below the price$23.13−94.1%below the priceA$0.01
Growth DCF−71.6%below the price$109n/a
Economic Profit−88.2%below the price$45.53n/a
Growth Earnings−69.4%below the price$118n/a
Minimum−94.0%below the price$23.13−94.1%below the priceA$0.01
Maximum−68.8%below the price$120−94.1%below the priceA$0.01
Median−74.7%below the price$97.34−94.1%below the priceA$0.01
Geometric mean−82.7%below the price$66.65−94.1%below the priceA$0.01

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Keysight Technologies: 24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Optiscan Imaging: 1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Keysight Technologies
Price $385
Fair Value $116
Bear $75.42Bull $153
Optiscan Imaging
Price A$0.17
Fair Value A$0.02
Bear A$0.01Bull A$0.02

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Keysight Technologies · Information Technology

Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−69.8% · bottom 25%

Optiscan Imaging · Health Care

Quality score26 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside−90.0% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Oct 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Keysight Technologies as the less overvalued of the two: Keysight Technologies trades at $385 versus a fair value of $116 (−69.8%), while Optiscan Imaging trades at A$0.17 versus A$0.02 (−90.0%).

Keysight Technologies has the higher quality score (70/100).

Open Keysight Technologies live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.