Lndaf vs Progressive: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Lndaf (LNDAF) and Progressive (PGR) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Progressive leads: 5 to 8 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Lndaf
6 of 6 models see the stock below the current price.
Progressive
3 of 4 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Lndaf · Financials
Progressive · Financials
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Progressive as the more attractively valued of the two: Lndaf trades at $1.40 versus a fair value of $0.99 (-29%), while Progressive trades at $215 versus $253 (+17%).
Progressive has the higher quality score (65/100).
See the full analysis →More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.