STOCK COMPARISON
Mader Group vs Cintas: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Mader Group (MAD) and Cintas (CTAS) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Mader Group as the less overvalued of the two: Mader Group trades at A$7.43 versus a fair value of A$4.77 (-36%), while Cintas trades at $203 versus $95.30 (-53%).
Mader Group
MAD.AU · AUD · Industrials
-36%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceA$7.43
Fair ValueA$4.77
Quality64/100
Cintas
CTAS · USD · Industrials
-53%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$203
Fair Value$95.30
Quality78/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Mader GroupCintas
Valuation
26.3×P/E (TTM)42.0×
1.16×P/S (TTM)7.33×
5.16×P/B16.06×
10.1×EV/EBITDA27.0×
—PEG3.06×
1.2%Dividend yield—
A$0.09Dividend per share$1.74
Profitability
7%Net margin18%
9%Operating margin24%
29%Return on equity41%
15%Return on assets16%
Growth
18%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
29.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.5%
26.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.6%
Balance & size
0.09×Debt / equity0.47×
$1BMarket cap$83B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Mader Group leads: 8 to 4 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Mader Groupof which business quality 64 · market factors 47
Cintasof which business quality 74 · market factors 53
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
81
91
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
61
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
41
67
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
80
70
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
30
71
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
76
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
37
44
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
29
45
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
79
90
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Mader Group
DCF ModelsA$6.39
Earnings-BasedA$7.93
MultiplesA$4.74
Asset-BasedA$0.70
Growth DCFA$4.95
Economic ProfitA$2.09
Growth EarningsA$9.87
17 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Cintas
DCF Models$96.89
Earnings-Based$48.67
Dividend Discount$30.85
Multiples$76.91
Asset-Based$8.61
Growth DCF$74.33
Economic Profit$58.94
Growth Earnings$81.35
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Mader Group
Bear A$3.58Fair Value A$4.77Bull A$12.81
A$7.43 = current price (white tick)
Cintas
Bear $56.44Fair Value $95.30Bull $121
$203 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Mader Group · Industrials
Quality score64 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-36% · below median
Cintas · Industrials
Quality score78 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-53% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Mader Group as the less overvalued of the two: Mader Group trades at A$7.43 versus a fair value of A$4.77 (-36%), while Cintas trades at $203 versus $95.30 (-53%).
Cintas has the higher quality score (78/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
