EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

MAG Interactive AB (publ) vs Konami Holdings: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how MAG Interactive AB (publ) (MAGI) and Konami Holdings (KNM) compare, as of Aug 31, 2026.

As of Aug 31, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees MAG Interactive AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: MAG Interactive AB (publ) trades at SEK 8.16 versus a fair value of SEK 5.10 (-38%), while Konami Holdings trades at £222 versus £71.97 (-68%).
MAG Interactive AB (publ)
MAGI.ST · SEK · Communication Services
-38%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceSEK 8.16
Fair ValueSEK 5.10
Quality64/100
Konami Holdings
KNM.LSE · GBP · Communication Services
-68%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price£222
Fair Value£71.97
Quality74/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

MAG Interactive AB (publ)Konami Holdings
Valuation
P/E (TTM)0.3×
0.06×P/S (TTM)
0.07×P/B
PEG2.12×
13.0%Dividend yield1.2%
Dividend per share£222
Profitability
-3%Net margin20%
-2%Operating margin24%
-3%Return on equity19%
-2%Return on assets12%
Growth
8%Revenue growth (YoY)27%
-5.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)16.2%
4.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)12.6%
Balance & size
Debt / equity0.07×
$21MMarket cap$3.5T
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Konami Holdings leads: 1 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

MAG Interactive AB (publ)of which business quality 66 · market factors 41 Konami Holdingsof which business quality 73 · market factors 60
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
16
66
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
24
74
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
84
65
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
93
99
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
40
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
51
53
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
50
56
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
14
73
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
90
82

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyMAG Interactive AB (publ)Price SEK 8.16Konami HoldingsPrice £222
DCF Models+161%above the priceSEK 21.33+6347%above the price£14,300
Earnings-Basedn/a+3237%above the price£7,401
Dividend Discountn/a+1390%above the price£3,304
Multiples+117%above the priceSEK 17.71+6500%above the price£14,639
Asset-Based-8%close to the priceSEK 7.53+1158%above the price£2,790
Growth DCF+232%above the priceSEK 27.12+5715%above the price£12,899
Economic Profitn/a+4099%above the price£9,313
Growth Earningsn/a+6050%above the price£13,641
Minimum-8%close to the priceSEK 7.53+1158%above the price£2,790
Maximum+232%above the priceSEK 27.12+6500%above the price£14,639
Median+139%above the priceSEK 19.52+4907%above the price£11,106
Geometric mean+104%above the priceSEK 16.66+3660%above the price£8,340

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

MAG Interactive AB (publ): 3 of 11 models see the stock below the current price.

Konami Holdings: 0 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

MAG Interactive AB (publ)
Bear SEK 4.53Fair Value SEK 5.10Bull SEK 5.67
SEK 8.16 = current price (white tick)
Konami Holdings
Bear £48.88Fair Value £71.97Bull £93.33
£222 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

MAG Interactive AB (publ) · Communication Services

Quality score64 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-38% · below median

Konami Holdings · Communication Services

Quality score74 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-68% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 31, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees MAG Interactive AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: MAG Interactive AB (publ) trades at SEK 8.16 versus a fair value of SEK 5.10 (-38%), while Konami Holdings trades at £222 versus £71.97 (-68%).

Konami Holdings has the higher quality score (74/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.