EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Neo-Concept International Group Holdings vs Ralph Lauren Corp Class A: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Neo-Concept International Group Holdings (NCI) and Ralph Lauren Corp Class A (RL) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Ralph Lauren Corp Class A as the less overvalued of the two: Neo-Concept International Group Holdings trades at $14.64 versus a fair value of $0.63 (-96%), while Ralph Lauren Corp Class A trades at $352 versus $225 (-36%).
Neo-Concept International Group Holdings
NCI · USD · Industrials
-96%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$14.64
Fair Value$0.63
Quality51/100
Ralph Lauren Corp Class A
RL · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-36%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$352
Fair Value$225
Quality82/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Neo-Concept International Group HoldingsRalph Lauren Corp Class A
Valuation
137.6×P/E (TTM)23.3×
0.19×P/S (TTM)2.59×
0.46×P/B7.40×
4.0×EV/EBITDA13.3×
1.13×PEG2.16×
−95.7%Fair value upside−36.0%
n/aDividend yield1.1%
n/aDividend per share$3.65
Profitability
-1%Operating margin13%
1%Return on equity35%
1%Return on assets11%
Growth
-51%Revenue growth (YoY)17%
-26.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.0%
-5.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)13.0%
−1.7%Value creation/yr+18.5%
Balance & size
1.3×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)21.8×
0.01×Debt / equity0.44×
$26MMarket cap$21B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A leads: 2 to 8 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Neo-Concept International Group Holdingsof which business quality 54 · market factors 35 Ralph Lauren Corp Class Aof which business quality 79 · market factors 44
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
44
87
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
25
74
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
74
50
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
37
87
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
48
86
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
45
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
35
42
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
19
48
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
100
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyNeo-Concept International Group HoldingsPrice $14.64Ralph Lauren Corp Class APrice $352
DCF Models+262%above the price$53.02-35%below the price$229
Earnings-Based-79%below the price$3.11-49%below the price$180
Multiples-52%below the price$7.08-34%below the price$233
Asset-Based+13%close to the price$16.57-91%below the price$30.55
Growth DCF+389%above the price$71.62-44%below the price$197
Economic Profit-32%below the price$10.00-51%below the price$171
Growth Earnings-84%below the price$2.30-23%below the price$272
Minimum-84%below the price$2.30-91%below the price$30.55
Maximum+389%above the price$71.62-23%below the price$272
Median-32%below the price$10.00-44%below the price$197
Geometric mean-19%below the price$11.80-54%below the price$160

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Neo-Concept International Group Holdings: 10 of 22 models see the stock below the current price.

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A: 22 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Neo-Concept International Group Holdings
Price $14.64
Fair Value $0.63
Bear $0.56Bull $0.68
Ralph Lauren Corp Class A
Price $352
Fair Value $225
Bear $154Bull $313

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Neo-Concept International Group Holdings · Industrials

Quality score51 · below median
Fair value upside-96% · bottom 25%

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score82 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-36% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Ralph Lauren Corp Class A as the less overvalued of the two: Neo-Concept International Group Holdings trades at $14.64 versus a fair value of $0.63 (-96%), while Ralph Lauren Corp Class A trades at $352 versus $225 (-36%).

Ralph Lauren Corp Class A has the higher quality score (82/100).

Open Ralph Lauren Corp Class A live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.